Appendix 5 – Air Quality Impact Assessment Methodology
Appendix 5 – Air Quality Impact Assessment Methodology
This section is also available in pdf format (116k)
Table A: Significance Criteria for Assessing Magnitude of Impact.
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) |
|
---|---|
Major Adverse |
‘With development’ results in an increase in concentrations over ‘without development’ concentrations of greater than 1 µg/m3 or 2.5%; where ‘without development’ concentrations are predicted to exceed the 40 µg/m-3 objective limit value; or ‘With development’ results in increases in concentrations greater than 1 µg/m3 or 2.5% that are predicted to cause exceedance of the 40 µg/m-3 objective limit value; where WITHOUT development concentrations are NOT predicted to exceed 40 µg/m-3 objective limit value; or ‘With development’ results in an increase in concentrations over ‘without development’ greater than 25%. |
Moderate Adverse |
‘With development results in an increase in concentrations over ‘without development’ concentrations of less than 1 µg/m3 or 2.5%; where ‘without development’ concentrations are predicted to exceed the 40 µg/m-3objective limit value; ‘With development’ results in an increase in concentrations over ‘without development’ of greater than 10% but less than 25% |
Minor Adverse |
‘With development’ results in an increase in concentrations over ‘without development’ concentrations of greater than 2.5% but less than 10% |
No significance / insignificant |
‘With development’ results in a change in concentrations over ‘without development’ concentrations of less than 1 µg/m3 or 2.5% |
Minor beneficial |
With development results in a decrease in concentrations over without development concentrations of greater than 2.5% but less than 10%. |
Moderate beneficial |
With development results in a decrease in concentrations over without development concentrations of greater than 10% but less than 25%. |
Major beneficial |
With development results in a decrease in concentrations over without development concentrations of greater than 25% |
Particulate Matter (PM10) |
|
Major Adverse |
With development results in an increase in concentrations over without development concentrations of greater than I µg/m3 or 2.5%; where without development concentrations are predicted to exceed the 40 µg/m3 objective limit value or With development results in increases in concentrations greater than 1 µg/m3 or 2.5% that are predicted to cause exceedance of the 40 µg/m3 objective limit value; where without development concentrations are not predicted to exceed 40 µg/m3 objective limit value With development results in an increase in concentrations over without development greater than 25% |
Moderate Adverse |
With development results in increases in concentrations greater than 1 µg/m3 or 2.5% but the actual concentration does not cause an exceedance of the 40µg/m3 objective limit or With development results in an increase in concentrations over without development concentrations of less than 1 or 2.5%; where without development concentrations are predicted to exceed 40 µg/m3objective limit value or With development results in an increase in concentrations over without development greater than 10% but less than 25% |
Minor Adverse |
With development results in an increase in concentrations over without development concentrations of greater than 1µg/m3 or 2.5% but less than 10% |
No significance/ insignificant |
With development results in concentrations over without development concentrations of less than 1 µg/m3 or 2.5% |
Minor beneficial |
With development results in a decrease in concentrations over without development concentrations of greater than 1µg/m3 or 2.5% but less than % |
Moderate beneficial |
With development results in a decrease in concentrations over without development concentrations of greater than 10% but less than 25% |
Major beneficial |
With development results in a decrease in concentrations over without development concentrations of greater than 25% |
NOTES |
Where air quality impacts meet multiple criteria, the higher significance class will be applied. |
Table B: Methodology for Determining Sensitivity.
Sensitivity |
Examples |
---|---|
High |
The location has little ability to absorb change without fundamentally altering its present character, or is of international or national importance. |
Moderate |
The location has moderate capacity to absorb change without significantly altering its present character, or is of high importance. |
Low |
The location is tolerant of change without detriment to its character, is of low or local importance. |
The significance of an impact from vehicular emissions is determined by the interaction of magnitude and sensitivity. The Impact Significance Matrix used in this assessment is set out Appendix H.
Table C: Impact Significance Matrix.
Magnitude |
Sensitivity |
||
---|---|---|---|
High |
Moderate |
Low |
|
Major |
Major Adverse/Beneficial |
Major – Moderate Adverse/Beneficial |
Moderate – Minor Adverse/Beneficial |
Moderate |
Major – Moderate Adverse/Beneficial |
Moderate – Minor Adverse/Beneficial |
Minor Adverse/Beneficial |
Minor |
Moderate – Minor Adverse/Beneficial |
Minor Adverse/Beneficial |
Minor – Negligible |
Negligible / Insignificant |
Negligible / Insignificant |
Negligible / Insignificant |
Negligible / Insignificant |