Appendix 5 – Air Quality Impact Assessment Methodology

Appendix 5 – Air Quality Impact Assessment Methodology

This section is also available in pdf format (116k)

Table A: Significance Criteria for Assessing Magnitude of Impact.

Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)

Major Adverse

‘With development’ results in an increase in concentrations over ‘without development’ concentrations of greater than 1 µg/m3 or 2.5%; where ‘without development’ concentrations are predicted to exceed the 40 µg/m-3 objective limit value; or

‘With development’ results in increases in concentrations greater than 1 µg/m3 or 2.5% that are predicted to cause exceedance of the 40 µg/m-3 objective limit value; where WITHOUT development concentrations are NOT predicted to exceed 40 µg/m-3 objective limit value; or

‘With development’ results in an increase in concentrations over ‘without development’ greater than 25%.

Moderate Adverse

‘With development results in an increase in concentrations over ‘without development’ concentrations of less than 1 µg/m3 or 2.5%; where ‘without development’ concentrations are predicted to exceed the 40 µg/m-3objective limit value;

‘With development’ results in an increase in concentrations over ‘without development’ of greater than 10% but less than 25%

Minor Adverse

‘With development’ results in an increase in concentrations over ‘without development’ concentrations of greater than 2.5% but less than 10%

No significance / insignificant

‘With development’ results in a change in concentrations over ‘without development’ concentrations of less than 1 µg/m3 or 2.5%

Minor beneficial

With development results in a decrease in concentrations over without development concentrations of greater than 2.5% but less than 10%.

Moderate beneficial

With development results in a decrease in concentrations over without development concentrations of greater than 10% but less than 25%.

Major beneficial

With development results in a decrease in concentrations over without development concentrations of greater than 25%

Particulate Matter (PM10)

Major Adverse

With development results in an increase in concentrations over without development concentrations of greater than I µg/m3 or 2.5%; where without development concentrations are predicted to exceed the 40 µg/m3 objective limit value or

With development results in increases in concentrations greater than 1 µg/m3 or 2.5% that are predicted to cause exceedance of the 40 µg/m3 objective limit value; where without development concentrations are not predicted to exceed 40 µg/m3 objective limit value

With development results in an increase in concentrations over without development greater than 25%

Moderate Adverse

With development results in increases in concentrations greater than 1 µg/m3 or 2.5% but the actual concentration does not cause an exceedance of the 40µg/m3 objective limit or

With development results in an increase in concentrations over without development concentrations of less than 1 or 2.5%; where without development concentrations are predicted to exceed 40 µg/m3objective limit value or

With development results in an increase in concentrations over without development greater than 10% but less than 25%

Minor Adverse

With development results in an increase in concentrations over without development concentrations of greater than 1µg/m3 or 2.5% but less than 10%

No significance/ insignificant

With development results in concentrations over without development concentrations of less than 1 µg/m3 or 2.5%

Minor beneficial

With development results in a decrease in concentrations over without development concentrations of greater than 1µg/m3 or 2.5% but less than %

Moderate beneficial

With development results in a decrease in concentrations over without development concentrations of greater than 10% but less than 25%

Major beneficial

With development results in a decrease in concentrations over without development concentrations of greater than 25%

NOTES

Where air quality impacts meet multiple criteria, the higher significance class will be applied.

Table B: Methodology for Determining Sensitivity.

Sensitivity

Examples

High

The location has little ability to absorb change without fundamentally altering its present character, or is of international or national importance.

Moderate

The location has moderate capacity to absorb change without significantly altering its present character, or is of high importance.

Low

The location is tolerant of change without detriment to its character, is of low or local importance.

The significance of an impact from vehicular emissions is determined by the interaction of magnitude and sensitivity. The Impact Significance Matrix used in this assessment is set out Appendix H.

Table C: Impact Significance Matrix.

Magnitude

Sensitivity

High

Moderate

Low

Major

Major Adverse/Beneficial

Major – Moderate Adverse/Beneficial

Moderate – Minor Adverse/Beneficial

Moderate

Major – Moderate Adverse/Beneficial

Moderate – Minor Adverse/Beneficial

Minor Adverse/Beneficial

Minor

Moderate – Minor Adverse/Beneficial

Minor Adverse/Beneficial

Minor – Negligible

Negligible / Insignificant

Negligible / Insignificant

Negligible / Insignificant

Negligible / Insignificant