17 Summary of Key Impacts 17.2 Environmental Impact Table

17 Summary of Key Impacts

This section is also available in pdf format (460k)

17.1 Introduction

This chapter presents a summary of the key environmental impacts associated with this particular road improvement scheme.

17.2 Environmental Impact Table

An Environmental Impacts Table (Table 17.1) has been prepared for the scheme, the purpose of which is to present the main predicted residual impacts associated with each scheme option in summarised form (taking account of agreed outline mitigation measures).

The table includes the following:

  • Description of the potential impact;
  • Sensitivity / value of the receptor;
  • Significance of impact without mitigation;
  • Mitigation measure(s) to address specified impact;
  • Significance of the impact with mitigation in place; and
  • Duration of the impact.

A description of likely effects for the ‘do nothing’ should the scheme not be developed has also been included, and mainly comprises a no change situation for the existing site conditions.

The mitigation measures reference in Table 17.1 are described in more detail in Chapters 5 to 15 and are summarised into a Schedule of Environmental Mitigation Measures (see Chapter 18 – Schedule of Environmental Committments). Cross-referencing between the two tables is provided by the reference numbers noted in bold.

Table 17.1. Environmental Impacts Table.

WITH PROPOSED SCHEME

DO MINIMUM

Description of Potential Impact

Sensitivity /Value of Receptor

Significance of Impact Without Mitigation

Mitigation Measure/s

Significance of Impact With Mitigation

Beneficial or Adverse
Duration of Impact (long, medium or short term)

Description of Predicted Effects

AIR QUALITY

One receptor on Link D (D47/5) unlikely to experience a change in air quality

High

Not significant

No specific mitigation required

N/A

Insignificant

No change from existing situation.

Three receptors on Link E (new side road) – unlikely to experience a change in air quality

High

Not significant

No specific mitigation required

N/A

Insignificant

No change from existing situation.

Air quality improvement for 94 receptors along Link A (C83 between D1/5 and C84)

High

Not significant

No specific mitigation required

N/A

Beneficial, long term

No change from existing situation.

Three receptors within 200m of A68 unlikely to experience a change

High

Not significant

No specific mitigation required

N/A

Insignificant

No change from existing situation.

Overall deterioration in NO2 for four properties

High

Not significant

No specific mitigation required

N/A

Adverse, long term

No change from existing situation.

No change in NO2 for 48 properties

High

Not significant

No specific mitigation required

N/A

Insignificant

No change from existing situation.

Improvement in NO2 for 47 properties

High

Not significant

No specific mitigation required

N/A

Beneficial, long term

No change from existing situation.

Overall deterioration in PM10 for four properties.

High

Not significant

No specific mitigation required

N/A

Adverse, long term

No change from existing situation.

No change in PM10 for 94 properties

High

Not significant

No specific mitigation required

N/A

Insignificant

No change from existing situation.

Improvement in PM10 for one property

High

Not significant

No specific mitigation required

N/A

Beneficial, long term

No change from existing situation.

CULTURAL HERITAGE

Demolition / loss / damage or severance of scheduled ancient Monuments (SAM) – Roman Fort / Annexes and Roman Camp

National

No impact

None required

No impact

N/A

No change from existing situation.

Damage to the B-listed Justice Hall/Courtroom

Regional

No impact

None required

No impact

N/A

No change from existing situation.

Potential to find undiscovered or unrecorded archaeological features during construction work

National

Major/Adverse

Preliminary archaeological investigation

Slight overall Impact

Significant, long term but beneficial

Adverse impact on currently undiscovered features of archaeological interest.

Damage to unscheduled Annfield Coaching Inn

Negligible / Local

Negligible/ Adverse

Archaeological evaluation, potential for slight adjustment to scheme alignment depending on results of archaeological evaluation

Application of HS ‘Special Requirements’

Not significant

Not significant

No change from existing situation.

Damage to Oxton village

Negligible / Local

Negligible/ Adverse

Damage to the Oxton railway station listed building

Negligible / Local

Negligible/ Adverse

Damage to the Justicehall Steading

Negligible / Local

Negligible/ Adverse

Damage to the listed Tower Hotel Oxton

Negligible / Local

Negligible/ Adverse

Damage to the listed Main Street, Oxton

Negligible / Local

Negligible/ Adverse

Damage to the "Kings Road"

Negligible / Local

No impact

N/A

No impact

N/A

No change from existing situation.

Damage to Channelkirk crop marks

Negligible / Local

No impact

No impact

N/A

No change from existing situation.

Damage to Mountmill linear crop marks

Negligible / Local

No impact

No impact

N/A

No change from existing situation.

Damage to Carfraemill enclosures and ring ditches

Negligible / Local

No impact

No impact

N/A

No change from existing situation.

Damage to Flint/arrowhead find site, disrupting potential for future findings at the site

Negligible / Local

No impact

No impact

N/A

No change from existing situation.

Damage to the Carfrae enclosure and crop mark

Negligible / Local

No impact

No impact

N/A

No change from existing situation.

Damage to the Carfrae Fort

Negligible / Local

No impact

No impact

N/A

No change from existing situation.

Damage to the Carfraemill enclosure

Negligible / Local

No impact

No impact

N/A

No change from existing situation.

Damage to the Carfraemill field systems and pits

Negligible / Local

No impact

No impact

N/A

No change from existing situation.

Damage to the Carfraegate dwelling

Negligible / Local

No impact

No impact

N/A

No change from existing situation.

LAND USE

Disruption of access, damage to Riggsyde.

Medium

Moderate / Adverse

Access will be provided along the new side road for Riggsyde. This access will include a turning area

Slight

Adverse

No change from existing situation.

Community Land

None present

No impact

N/A

No impact

N/A

N/A

Development Land

None present

No impact

N/A

No impact

N/A

N/A

Henry’s Wood

Low

Slight / Adverse

No mitigation measures required but minimise land take and best practice in terms of construction techniques to avoid unnecessary loss.

Not significant

Not significant

No change from existing situation.

Loss, damage or disturbance to agricultural land

Medium

Slight / Adverse

No mitigation measures required but minimise land take and best practice in terms of construction techniques to avoid unnecessary loss. Re-use excavated soils in earth mounding and landscaping operations. Restoration of disturb areas to original use wherever possible. Compensation for loss of land and relocation of access arrangements wherever possible. Provision of water troughs at Carfrae Farm and Kirktonhill Farm if deemed necessary as part of the accommodation works. Provision of stock-holding pens to assist in the movement of stock across the A68.

(Note: All accommodation works are subject to the agreement of the affected landowners.)

Slight

Adverse

No change from existing situation

Disruption to stock movements at Carfrae Farm

Medium

Slight / Adverse

Provision of stock-holding pens to assist in the movement of stock across the A68.

Provision of access tracks for Netherhowden Farm.

(Note: All accommodation works are subject to the agreement of the affected landowners.)

Negligible

Adverse

No change

Land take and severance / access at Carfrae Farm

Medium

Slight / Adverse

Slight

Adverse

No change

Disruption to stock movements at Netherhowden Farm

Medium

Moderate / Adverse

Slight

Adverse

No change

Land take and loss or severance of existing access arrangements at Netherhowden Farm

Medium

Moderate / Adverse

Slight

Adverse

No change

Disruption or damage to land under forestry regimes

None present

No impact

N/A

No impact

N/A

N/A

Re-alignment of the D47/5

Negligible/ Local

Slight / Adverse

No mitigation measures required

Slight

Adverse

No change from existing situation

Disruption of waterways

None present

No impact

N/A

No impact

N/A

N/A

ECOLOGY AND NATURE CONSERVATION

Impacts upon the ecological features of interest related to the River Tweed SAC:

   

Agreement with SNH and SEPA regarding the methodology to be used for construction of the extension to avoid smothering of eggs and fry.

No in-river activities during spawning and fry development months (December to end of June).

Otter passage would be restricted but still possible during construction works and afterwards, with the installation of an otter ledge within the Annfield Bridge along with the presence of the new underpass.

   

No change from existing conditions.

Fisheries Interests

International

Major / Adverse

Slight

Adverse

Otter

International

Neutral

Neutral

Neutral

Ranunclion fluitantis / Callitricho-Batrachion plants

International

Neutral

Neutral

Neutral

Loss of vegetation and habitat resulting from land take:

   

None required but minimise land take and best practice in terms of construction techniques to avoid unnecessary loss. Re-instatement of hedgerows with native species, planting of trees along Headshaw Burn and additional landscape design.

   

No change from existing conditions.

Agricultural land / verge

Negligible

Neutral

Neutral

Neutral

Riparian/river banks/aquatic

Local

Neutral

Slight

Beneficial

Hedgerow

Negligible

Neutral

Slight

Beneficial

Disturbance / damage to wildlife and habitats from the demolition / extension of bridge and other structures (bats/otters/river):

Annfield Bridge (extension)

International

Slight / Beneficial

None required but pre-construction surveys to be completed before any site works to ensure no changes in baseline information and no disturbance to nearby otter holt. No working out with daytime hours and within 30m of otter holt without licence. Also in-river engineering licence required. Production of a Method Statement for agreement with SNH/SEPA.

Slight

Beneficial, long term

No change to existing situation.

Fragmentation, RTA’s and disturbance to protected mammal species and ornithological interests:

   

Directional lighting to be used when required. Plant and machines turned off when not in use. Pre-construction checks for protected species and erection of temporary barriers or fencing to prevent damage / disturbance to holt. Erection of combined badger/otter fencing and otter ledges at Annfield Bridge.

None required.

   

No change to existing situation.

Badger movements A68

National

Slight / Adverse

Neutral

Neutral

Badger movements Annfield Bridge

National

Major / Adverse

Neutral

Neutral

Setts/foraging activity

National

Neutral

Neutral

Neutral

Otters (mortality / RTAs)

International

Neutral

Slight

Beneficial

Bats (tree felling, bridge works)

International

Critical / Adverse

Slight

Adverse

Breeding birds / non-protected species

Local

Neutral

Neutral

Neutral

Changes to water quality of watercourses in terms of ecology and aquatic habitats:

   

Improved drainage facilities using swales and attenuation pond to detain accidental spills/pollution incidents. Implementation of a Water Quality Protection Plan and Pollution Incident Response Plan.

   

No change to existing drainage system (no protection from spillage, direct discharge into Headshaw Burn / fields).

Direct pollution / accident spillage

International

Critical / Adverse

Slight

Adverse, long / short term

Indirect run-off from drainage

International

Neutral

Slight

Adverse, long / short term

LANDSCAPE EFFECTS

Landscape Character

Loss of hedgerow and creation of embankments

Low

Slight to Moderate / Adverse

Avoidance of loss ordamage to hedges, walls, woodlands and valued land forms by on-line alignment of the scheme. Minimise land take to reduce impacts on land use. Reinstatement of poor quality hedgerows with new planting of hedgerows.

Negligible

Beneficial

No change from current situation.

New side road construction and private access to Riggsyde

Medium

Slight to Moderate / Adverse

Creation of new private access to Riggsyde from new side road as opposed to current access from A68

Negligible

Beneficial

No change from current situation.

Landscape features

Low

Slight to Moderate / Adverse

Appropriate alignment of cutting to prevent visual impact, provision of screening measures such as mounds, fencing and tree planting to reduce visual impact

Negligible

Not significant

No change from current situation.

Visual Effects

Visual impact pf vehicles, new side road and new road signage in general

Low

Slight / Adverse

Earth moulding and screen planting to screen road from sensitive receptors

Negligible

Not significant

No change from current situation.

TRAFFIC NOISE AND VIBRATION

Increase in noise of less than 1dB(A) likely to affect 12 sensitive receptors in 2025 (Design Year)

Moderate

Insignificant / Adverse

No mitigation required

N/A

Adverse, long term

Slight increase in noise as traffic levels rise.

PEDESTRIANS, CYCLISTS, EQUESTRIANS AND COMMUNITY EFFECTS

Pedestrians:

Stopping up of C83 junction and realignment of D47/5 junction and new side road construction

Low

Slight / Beneficial

No mitigation required due to installation of underpass to link C83 and D47/5 and re-classification of C83. These provisions should encourage additional pedestrian journeys.

Slight

Beneficial long term

No change.

Cyclists:

Stopping up of C83 junction and realignment of D47/5 junction and crossing of A68.

Low

Slight / Beneficial

No mitigation required due to underpass and re-classification of C83.

Slight

Beneficial

No change.

Travelling along A68

Low

Slight / Beneficial

Presence of 1m strips at side of new road.

Slight

Beneficial

No change.

Equestrians:

Stopping up of C83 junction and realignment of D47/5 junction.

Low

Slight / Beneficial

No mitigation required due to underpass provision.

Slight

Beneficial, long term.

No change.

Community:

Removal of bus lay-bys on A68

Low

Negligible

N/A

Negligible

Adverse

No change.

Community:

Closure of C83 and effect on community.

Medium

No impact

New side road construction between C83 and C84 results in no traffic increase in Oxton village

No impact

N/A

No change.

Vehicle Journeys:

Increased vehicle journeys

Low

Slight / Adverse

New side road construction between C83 and C84. Access tracks to replace field gates closed off.

Slight

Adverse, long term

No change.

VEHICLE TRAVELLERS

   

Views from the road

Medium

Negligible / Adverse

Mitigation measures incorporated into scheme design to reduce any impacts.

Negligible

Adverse long term

No change.

Driver Stress

       

Southbound

High

Major / Beneficial

Major

Beneficial long term

Northbound

Medium

Slight / Beneficial

Slight

Beneficial long term

Accidents

Medium

Moderate / Beneficial

Moderate

Beneficial long term

ROAD DRAINAGE AND THE WATER ENVIRONMENT

Impacts of water quality of the Headshaw Burn as a result of increased run-off

Very High

Neutral

Appropriate timing and engineering techniques adopted. Bridge extension constructed in accordance with the Water Framework Directive and SEPA’s licensing requirements. Development of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) to mitigate for any potential water quality and drainage impacts. Construction of earthwork embankments for the D47/5 re-alignment which will control flooding of the A68 by the Headshaw Burn. Proposed tree planting in vicinity of soakaways to further prevent flooding.

Slight

Beneficial

No change to existing situation.

Impacts of water quality of the Headshaw Burn as a result of accidental spillage

Very High

Neutral

Slight

Beneficial

Impacts of water quality of the Leader Water as a result of increased run-off

Very High

Neutral

Slight

Beneficial

Impacts of water quality of the Leader Water as a result of accidental spillage

Very High

Neutral

Slight

Beneficial

Groundwater impacts

Medium

Neutral

No specific mitigation due to inclusion of Sustainable Urban Drainage System (SUDS) to improve water quality and minimise drainage impacts.

Neutral

Beneficial

No change to existing situation.

Flooding

Low

Neutral

Construction of the earthwork embankments for the D47/5 re-alignment, construction of soakaways and tree planting.

Neutral

N/A

No change to existing situation.

Bridge extension / new bridge

Very High

Neutral

Construction Method Statement & Pollution Control Measures

Neutral

N/A

No change to existing situation.

GEOLOGY AND SOILS

   

Earthworks impact upon geological and soil conditions of the site (from removal and fill processes)

Low

Negligible

No specific mitigation required. Best practice includes:

Impact of excavated material generated through cutting activity will be reduced through on-site reuse of excavated material. On site storage facilities will be provided to protect excavated materials from weather. Contractor will be required to employ best practice to maximise reuse of excavated materials. Imported fill materials will be required, but these materials only be used where absolutely necessary.

Negligible

Adverse

No change from current situation.

Hydrological impacts due to changes in ground permeability and embankment construction

Low

Negligible

No specific mitigation required. Inclusion of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) to mitigate for any potential water quality and drainage impacts.

Negligible

Adverse

No change from current situation.

DISRUPTION DUE TO CONSTRUCTION

Temporary increase in airborne dust levels due to construction activities

N/A

Insignificant

Use of dust suppression techniques such as regular water spraying to minimise airborne dust load. Ensure that any pollution emitting plants are not located in the vicinity of a receptor unnecessary.

Insignificant

Short term

No change from current situation.

Decrease in air quality due to construction activities (at properties within 100 metres of existing and proposed A68

N/A

Insignificant

Damage to or disturbance of cultural heritage features (four identified within 100m).

Local

Major / Adverse

Preventing access to cultural heritage feature by identifying sensitive features in contract documents and fencing off prior the onset of construction. Archaeological monitoring of any works that may cause subsurface damage and recording of any archaeological features discovered. Inclusion of ‘special requirements’ provided by Historic Scotland in contract documents and implementation of ‘special requirements’ during works

Negligible

Adverse

No change from current situation.

Disruption to access arrangements to land and property due to construction and temporary land take.

Medium

Slight / Adverse

Financial agreement between contractor and land owner to compensate for temporary land take to facility construction compound. Reinstate temporary land take to its former use as quickly as possible.

Slight

Adverse/ Short term

No change from current situation.

Loss of access to Riggsyde during construction activities.

Medium

Negligible / Adverse

Provide temporary access where access is disrupted during construction

Negligible

Adverse / Short term

No change from current situation.

Disturbance to Headshaw Burn during extension of the Annfield Bridge

International

Critical / Adverse

Creation and implementation of Construction Method Statement (as per Habitat Regs requirements), application of sensitive construction techniques, no obstruction to banks or channels. Completion of a fish rescue. Application of British Standards.

Slight

Adverse, short term and possibly long term

No change from current situation.

Pollution of Headshaw Burn and other watercourses

International

Critical / Adverse

Application of a Construction Method Statement outlining construction techniques to be applied and pollution control mitigation requirements. Authorisation under the CAR and application of licence conditions. Adherance to SEPA PPG Guidelines and WFD Engineering guidelines along with restrictions in timing of certain activities and consultation with SEPA. Implementation of SUD systems and improved drainage design.

Slight

Adverse, short and long term

No change from current situation – risk of environmental damage due to pollution incident.

Disturbance to otter (both within places of shelter and movement behaviour) and protected species due to construction.

   

Clear demarkation of 10m zone around otter holt. Toolbox talks to contractors. Pre-construction survey of holt condition (natal status) and other potential new holts. Licence from SE. Minimisation of disturbance within 100m and restricted work programs / timings

   

No change to existing conditions.

Otter holt

International

Major / Adverse

Slight

Adverse

Otter movement / passage

International

Major / Adverse

Slight

Adverse

Disturbance due to human activity, noise, dust and light:

   

Completion of pre-construction surveys, covering of culverts and excavations to avoid trapping of animals, ecological watching brief as required, sensitive timing of works (e.g. avoidance of breeding bird season), obtaining of licences to meet with legal requirements, dust suppression, application of an EMS and use of lighting minimised and directed away from sensitive receptors such as watercourses etc.

   

Unchanged from current levels of disturbance from humans, dust, light and noise.

Breeding birds

Local

Slight / Adverse

Neutral

N/A

Otters / bats

International

Slight / Adverse

Neutral

N/A

Badgers

National

Neutral

Neutral

N/A

Dust

Not significant

Neutral

Neutral

N/A

Light

International to Local

Neutral

Neutral

N/A

Visual impact during construction upon nearby properties and road users.

Medium

Moderate / Adverse

Retention of existing vegetation; limit to size / extent of working and storage areas; good site management and housekeeping; limited use of temporary floodlighting.

Moderate

Adverse, short term

No change to effect from existing A68.

Noise and vibration impacts upon residential properties (Riggsyde and The Shieling) and wildlife.

N/A

Moderate / Adverse

Inclusion of the following control measures within the EMS:

Sensitive programming of works during normal working hours;

Informing properties of duration and intensity of particularly noisy activities / processes;

Adherence to standard noise levels set by SBC Environmental Health Officer; and

Noisy activities timed for completion out with recognised breeding periods for sensitive species.

Moderate

Adverse, short term

No change from existing conditions.

Disruption to non-vehicle road users such as crossing of C83 and D47/5 junction, access to Carfraemill Hotel

Low

Negligible

N/A - alternative provisions to be provided by the contractor.

Best practice to include:

Fencing off of works and provide clear signage.

Negligible

Short term

Continued risk from crossing A68 at C83 and D47/5 junctions. No change to current hotel access arrangements.

Impairment of driver views by construction works and floodlighting

Medium

Moderate / Adverse

Limit size and extent of working areas; clear signage and traffic management; good site management and house keeping; advance notification via local radio and media of likely delays; and limited use of temporary floodlighting.

Moderate

Adverse, short term

No change from existing condition / stress levels.

Increased driver stress due to unfamiliar conditions / site plant presence and increase in journey times

Medium

Moderate / Adverse

Limit size and extent of working areas; clear signage and traffic management; good site management and house keeping; advance notification via local radio and media of likely delays; and limited use of temporary floodlighting.

Moderate

Adverse, short term

No change from existing condition / stress levels.

Hydrological and water quality impacts upon the Headshaw Burn, Leader Water and associated catchment (e.g. construction disturbance and damage and accidental spillage)

Very high

Moderate to Large / Adverse

Application of SEPA PPG’s; consultation with SEPA re. detailed drainage design; inclusion of EMS procedures for appropriate storage on site of materials, temporary pollution control, restricted access near watercourses and contingency plans for emergency situations.

Slight

Adverse, short and long term

Continued existing risk from current A68 drainage and maintenance work requirements / accidental spillage.

Impact upon groundwater sources

Medium

Neutral

N/A

Neutral

N/A

As existing conditions.

Impact of importing fill material to site and associated disruption

Low

Slight / Adverse

No mitigation required.

Best practice includes:

Limitations on the extent and location of working / storage areas;

Implementation of erosion and sediment controls;

Appropriate handling and storage of spoil; and

Re-use of excavated materials.

Slight

Adverse

No change to current situation

Storage of material on site prior to replacement as fill material

Low

Negligible / Adverse

No mitigation required.

Best practice includes:

Limitations on the extent and location of working / storage areas;

Implementation of erosion and sediment controls;

Appropriate handling and storage of spoil; and

Re-use of excavated materials.

Negligible

Adverse

No change to current situation