17 Summary of Key Impacts 17.2 Environmental Impact Table
17 Summary of Key Impacts
This section is also available in pdf format (460k)
17.1 Introduction
This chapter presents a summary of the key environmental impacts associated with this particular road improvement scheme.
17.2 Environmental Impact Table
An Environmental Impacts Table (Table 17.1) has been prepared for the scheme, the purpose of which is to present the main predicted residual impacts associated with each scheme option in summarised form (taking account of agreed outline mitigation measures).
The table includes the following:
- Description of the potential impact;
- Sensitivity / value of the receptor;
- Significance of impact without mitigation;
- Mitigation measure(s) to address specified impact;
- Significance of the impact with mitigation in place; and
- Duration of the impact.
A description of likely effects for the ‘do nothing’ should the scheme not be developed has also been included, and mainly comprises a no change situation for the existing site conditions.
The mitigation measures reference in Table 17.1 are described in more detail in Chapters 5 to 15 and are summarised into a Schedule of Environmental Mitigation Measures (see Chapter 18 – Schedule of Environmental Committments). Cross-referencing between the two tables is provided by the reference numbers noted in bold.
Table 17.1. Environmental Impacts Table.
WITH PROPOSED SCHEME |
DO MINIMUM |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description of Potential Impact |
Sensitivity /Value of Receptor |
Significance of Impact Without Mitigation |
Mitigation Measure/s |
Significance of Impact With Mitigation |
Beneficial or Adverse |
Description of Predicted Effects |
|
AIR QUALITY |
|||||||
One receptor on Link D (D47/5) unlikely to experience a change in air quality |
High |
Not significant |
No specific mitigation required |
N/A |
Insignificant |
No change from existing situation. |
|
Three receptors on Link E (new side road) – unlikely to experience a change in air quality |
High |
Not significant |
No specific mitigation required |
N/A |
Insignificant |
No change from existing situation. |
|
Air quality improvement for 94 receptors along Link A (C83 between D1/5 and C84) |
High |
Not significant |
No specific mitigation required |
N/A |
Beneficial, long term |
No change from existing situation. |
|
Three receptors within 200m of A68 unlikely to experience a change |
High |
Not significant |
No specific mitigation required |
N/A |
Insignificant |
No change from existing situation. |
|
Overall deterioration in NO2 for four properties |
High |
Not significant |
No specific mitigation required |
N/A |
Adverse, long term |
No change from existing situation. |
|
No change in NO2 for 48 properties |
High |
Not significant |
No specific mitigation required |
N/A |
Insignificant |
No change from existing situation. |
|
Improvement in NO2 for 47 properties |
High |
Not significant |
No specific mitigation required |
N/A |
Beneficial, long term |
No change from existing situation. |
|
Overall deterioration in PM10 for four properties. |
High |
Not significant |
No specific mitigation required |
N/A |
Adverse, long term |
No change from existing situation. |
|
No change in PM10 for 94 properties |
High |
Not significant |
No specific mitigation required |
N/A |
Insignificant |
No change from existing situation. |
|
Improvement in PM10 for one property |
High |
Not significant |
No specific mitigation required |
N/A |
Beneficial, long term |
No change from existing situation. |
|
CULTURAL HERITAGE |
|||||||
Demolition / loss / damage or severance of scheduled ancient Monuments (SAM) – Roman Fort / Annexes and Roman Camp |
National |
No impact |
None required |
No impact |
N/A |
No change from existing situation. |
|
Damage to the B-listed Justice Hall/Courtroom |
Regional |
No impact |
None required |
No impact |
N/A |
No change from existing situation. |
|
Potential to find undiscovered or unrecorded archaeological features during construction work |
National |
Major/Adverse |
Preliminary archaeological investigation |
Slight overall Impact |
Significant, long term but beneficial |
Adverse impact on currently undiscovered features of archaeological interest. |
|
Damage to unscheduled Annfield Coaching Inn |
Negligible / Local |
Negligible/ Adverse |
Archaeological evaluation, potential for slight adjustment to scheme alignment depending on results of archaeological evaluation Application of HS ‘Special Requirements’ |
Not significant |
Not significant |
No change from existing situation. |
|
Damage to Oxton village |
Negligible / Local |
Negligible/ Adverse |
|||||
Damage to the Oxton railway station listed building |
Negligible / Local |
Negligible/ Adverse |
|||||
Damage to the Justicehall Steading |
Negligible / Local |
Negligible/ Adverse |
|||||
Damage to the listed Tower Hotel Oxton |
Negligible / Local |
Negligible/ Adverse |
|||||
Damage to the listed Main Street, Oxton |
Negligible / Local |
Negligible/ Adverse |
|||||
Damage to the "Kings Road" |
Negligible / Local |
No impact |
N/A |
No impact |
N/A |
No change from existing situation. |
|
Damage to Channelkirk crop marks |
Negligible / Local |
No impact |
No impact |
N/A |
No change from existing situation. |
||
Damage to Mountmill linear crop marks |
Negligible / Local |
No impact |
No impact |
N/A |
No change from existing situation. |
||
Damage to Carfraemill enclosures and ring ditches |
Negligible / Local |
No impact |
No impact |
N/A |
No change from existing situation. |
||
Damage to Flint/arrowhead find site, disrupting potential for future findings at the site |
Negligible / Local |
No impact |
No impact |
N/A |
No change from existing situation. |
||
Damage to the Carfrae enclosure and crop mark |
Negligible / Local |
No impact |
No impact |
N/A |
No change from existing situation. |
||
Damage to the Carfrae Fort |
Negligible / Local |
No impact |
No impact |
N/A |
No change from existing situation. |
||
Damage to the Carfraemill enclosure |
Negligible / Local |
No impact |
No impact |
N/A |
No change from existing situation. |
||
Damage to the Carfraemill field systems and pits |
Negligible / Local |
No impact |
No impact |
N/A |
No change from existing situation. |
||
Damage to the Carfraegate dwelling |
Negligible / Local |
No impact |
No impact |
N/A |
No change from existing situation. |
||
LAND USE |
|||||||
Disruption of access, damage to Riggsyde. |
Medium |
Moderate / Adverse |
Access will be provided along the new side road for Riggsyde. This access will include a turning area |
Slight |
Adverse |
No change from existing situation. |
|
Community Land |
None present |
No impact |
N/A |
No impact |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Development Land |
None present |
No impact |
N/A |
No impact |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Henry’s Wood |
Low |
Slight / Adverse |
No mitigation measures required but minimise land take and best practice in terms of construction techniques to avoid unnecessary loss. |
Not significant |
Not significant |
No change from existing situation. |
|
Loss, damage or disturbance to agricultural land |
Medium |
Slight / Adverse |
No mitigation measures required but minimise land take and best practice in terms of construction techniques to avoid unnecessary loss. Re-use excavated soils in earth mounding and landscaping operations. Restoration of disturb areas to original use wherever possible. Compensation for loss of land and relocation of access arrangements wherever possible. Provision of water troughs at Carfrae Farm and Kirktonhill Farm if deemed necessary as part of the accommodation works. Provision of stock-holding pens to assist in the movement of stock across the A68. (Note: All accommodation works are subject to the agreement of the affected landowners.) |
Slight |
Adverse |
No change from existing situation |
|
Disruption to stock movements at Carfrae Farm |
Medium |
Slight / Adverse |
Provision of stock-holding pens to assist in the movement of stock across the A68. Provision of access tracks for Netherhowden Farm. (Note: All accommodation works are subject to the agreement of the affected landowners.) |
Negligible |
Adverse |
No change |
|
Land take and severance / access at Carfrae Farm |
Medium |
Slight / Adverse |
Slight |
Adverse |
No change |
||
Disruption to stock movements at Netherhowden Farm |
Medium |
Moderate / Adverse |
Slight |
Adverse |
No change |
||
Land take and loss or severance of existing access arrangements at Netherhowden Farm |
Medium |
Moderate / Adverse |
Slight |
Adverse |
No change |
||
Disruption or damage to land under forestry regimes |
None present |
No impact |
N/A |
No impact |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Re-alignment of the D47/5 |
Negligible/ Local |
Slight / Adverse |
No mitigation measures required |
Slight |
Adverse |
No change from existing situation |
|
Disruption of waterways |
None present |
No impact |
N/A |
No impact |
N/A |
N/A |
|
ECOLOGY AND NATURE CONSERVATION |
|||||||
Impacts upon the ecological features of interest related to the River Tweed SAC: |
Agreement with SNH and SEPA regarding the methodology to be used for construction of the extension to avoid smothering of eggs and fry. No in-river activities during spawning and fry development months (December to end of June). Otter passage would be restricted but still possible during construction works and afterwards, with the installation of an otter ledge within the Annfield Bridge along with the presence of the new underpass. |
No change from existing conditions. |
|||||
Fisheries Interests |
International |
Major / Adverse |
Slight |
Adverse |
|||
Otter |
International |
Neutral |
Neutral |
Neutral |
|||
Ranunclion fluitantis / Callitricho-Batrachion plants |
International |
Neutral |
Neutral |
Neutral |
|||
Loss of vegetation and habitat resulting from land take: |
None required but minimise land take and best practice in terms of construction techniques to avoid unnecessary loss. Re-instatement of hedgerows with native species, planting of trees along Headshaw Burn and additional landscape design. |
No change from existing conditions. |
|||||
Agricultural land / verge |
Negligible |
Neutral |
Neutral |
Neutral |
|||
Riparian/river banks/aquatic |
Local |
Neutral |
Slight |
Beneficial |
|||
Hedgerow |
Negligible |
Neutral |
Slight |
Beneficial |
|||
Disturbance / damage to wildlife and habitats from the demolition / extension of bridge and other structures (bats/otters/river): Annfield Bridge (extension) |
International |
Slight / Beneficial |
None required but pre-construction surveys to be completed before any site works to ensure no changes in baseline information and no disturbance to nearby otter holt. No working out with daytime hours and within 30m of otter holt without licence. Also in-river engineering licence required. Production of a Method Statement for agreement with SNH/SEPA. |
Slight |
Beneficial, long term |
No change to existing situation. |
|
Fragmentation, RTA’s and disturbance to protected mammal species and ornithological interests: |
Directional lighting to be used when required. Plant and machines turned off when not in use. Pre-construction checks for protected species and erection of temporary barriers or fencing to prevent damage / disturbance to holt. Erection of combined badger/otter fencing and otter ledges at Annfield Bridge. None required. |
No change to existing situation. |
|||||
Badger movements A68 |
National |
Slight / Adverse |
Neutral |
Neutral |
|||
Badger movements Annfield Bridge |
National |
Major / Adverse |
Neutral |
Neutral |
|||
Setts/foraging activity |
National |
Neutral |
Neutral |
Neutral |
|||
Otters (mortality / RTAs) |
International |
Neutral |
Slight |
Beneficial |
|||
Bats (tree felling, bridge works) |
International |
Critical / Adverse |
Slight |
Adverse |
|||
Breeding birds / non-protected species |
Local |
Neutral |
Neutral |
Neutral |
|||
Changes to water quality of watercourses in terms of ecology and aquatic habitats: |
Improved drainage facilities using swales and attenuation pond to detain accidental spills/pollution incidents. Implementation of a Water Quality Protection Plan and Pollution Incident Response Plan. |
No change to existing drainage system (no protection from spillage, direct discharge into Headshaw Burn / fields). |
|||||
Direct pollution / accident spillage |
International |
Critical / Adverse |
Slight |
Adverse, long / short term |
|||
Indirect run-off from drainage |
International |
Neutral |
Slight |
Adverse, long / short term |
|||
LANDSCAPE EFFECTS |
|||||||
Landscape Character |
|||||||
Loss of hedgerow and creation of embankments |
Low |
Slight to Moderate / Adverse |
Avoidance of loss ordamage to hedges, walls, woodlands and valued land forms by on-line alignment of the scheme. Minimise land take to reduce impacts on land use. Reinstatement of poor quality hedgerows with new planting of hedgerows. |
Negligible |
Beneficial |
No change from current situation. |
|
New side road construction and private access to Riggsyde |
Medium |
Slight to Moderate / Adverse |
Creation of new private access to Riggsyde from new side road as opposed to current access from A68 |
Negligible |
Beneficial |
No change from current situation. |
|
Landscape features |
Low |
Slight to Moderate / Adverse |
Appropriate alignment of cutting to prevent visual impact, provision of screening measures such as mounds, fencing and tree planting to reduce visual impact |
Negligible |
Not significant |
No change from current situation. |
|
Visual Effects |
|||||||
Visual impact pf vehicles, new side road and new road signage in general |
Low |
Slight / Adverse |
Earth moulding and screen planting to screen road from sensitive receptors |
Negligible |
Not significant |
No change from current situation. |
|
TRAFFIC NOISE AND VIBRATION |
|||||||
Increase in noise of less than 1dB(A) likely to affect 12 sensitive receptors in 2025 (Design Year) |
Moderate |
Insignificant / Adverse |
No mitigation required |
N/A |
Adverse, long term |
Slight increase in noise as traffic levels rise. |
|
PEDESTRIANS, CYCLISTS, EQUESTRIANS AND COMMUNITY EFFECTS |
|||||||
Pedestrians: Stopping up of C83 junction and realignment of D47/5 junction and new side road construction |
Low |
Slight / Beneficial |
No mitigation required due to installation of underpass to link C83 and D47/5 and re-classification of C83. These provisions should encourage additional pedestrian journeys. |
Slight |
Beneficial long term |
No change. |
|
Cyclists: Stopping up of C83 junction and realignment of D47/5 junction and crossing of A68. |
Low |
Slight / Beneficial |
No mitigation required due to underpass and re-classification of C83. |
Slight |
Beneficial |
No change. |
|
Travelling along A68 |
Low |
Slight / Beneficial |
Presence of 1m strips at side of new road. |
Slight |
Beneficial |
No change. |
|
Equestrians: Stopping up of C83 junction and realignment of D47/5 junction. |
Low |
Slight / Beneficial |
No mitigation required due to underpass provision. |
Slight |
Beneficial, long term. |
No change. |
|
Community: Removal of bus lay-bys on A68 |
Low |
Negligible |
N/A |
Negligible |
Adverse |
No change. |
|
Community: Closure of C83 and effect on community. |
Medium |
No impact |
New side road construction between C83 and C84 results in no traffic increase in Oxton village |
No impact |
N/A |
No change. |
|
Vehicle Journeys: Increased vehicle journeys |
Low |
Slight / Adverse |
New side road construction between C83 and C84. Access tracks to replace field gates closed off. |
Slight |
Adverse, long term |
No change. |
|
VEHICLE TRAVELLERS |
|||||||
Views from the road |
Medium |
Negligible / Adverse |
Mitigation measures incorporated into scheme design to reduce any impacts. |
Negligible |
Adverse long term |
No change. |
|
Driver Stress |
|||||||
Southbound |
High |
Major / Beneficial |
Major |
Beneficial long term |
|||
Northbound |
Medium |
Slight / Beneficial |
Slight |
Beneficial long term |
|||
Accidents |
Medium |
Moderate / Beneficial |
Moderate |
Beneficial long term |
|||
ROAD DRAINAGE AND THE WATER ENVIRONMENT |
|||||||
Impacts of water quality of the Headshaw Burn as a result of increased run-off |
Very High |
Neutral |
Appropriate timing and engineering techniques adopted. Bridge extension constructed in accordance with the Water Framework Directive and SEPA’s licensing requirements. Development of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) to mitigate for any potential water quality and drainage impacts. Construction of earthwork embankments for the D47/5 re-alignment which will control flooding of the A68 by the Headshaw Burn. Proposed tree planting in vicinity of soakaways to further prevent flooding. |
Slight |
Beneficial |
No change to existing situation. |
|
Impacts of water quality of the Headshaw Burn as a result of accidental spillage |
Very High |
Neutral |
Slight |
Beneficial |
|||
Impacts of water quality of the Leader Water as a result of increased run-off |
Very High |
Neutral |
Slight |
Beneficial |
|||
Impacts of water quality of the Leader Water as a result of accidental spillage |
Very High |
Neutral |
Slight |
Beneficial |
|||
Groundwater impacts |
Medium |
Neutral |
No specific mitigation due to inclusion of Sustainable Urban Drainage System (SUDS) to improve water quality and minimise drainage impacts. |
Neutral |
Beneficial |
No change to existing situation. |
|
Flooding |
Low |
Neutral |
Construction of the earthwork embankments for the D47/5 re-alignment, construction of soakaways and tree planting. |
Neutral |
N/A |
No change to existing situation. |
|
Bridge extension / new bridge |
Very High |
Neutral |
Construction Method Statement & Pollution Control Measures |
Neutral |
N/A |
No change to existing situation. |
|
GEOLOGY AND SOILS |
|||||||
Earthworks impact upon geological and soil conditions of the site (from removal and fill processes) |
Low |
Negligible |
No specific mitigation required. Best practice includes: Impact of excavated material generated through cutting activity will be reduced through on-site reuse of excavated material. On site storage facilities will be provided to protect excavated materials from weather. Contractor will be required to employ best practice to maximise reuse of excavated materials. Imported fill materials will be required, but these materials only be used where absolutely necessary. |
Negligible |
Adverse |
No change from current situation. |
|
Hydrological impacts due to changes in ground permeability and embankment construction |
Low |
Negligible |
No specific mitigation required. Inclusion of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) to mitigate for any potential water quality and drainage impacts. |
Negligible |
Adverse |
No change from current situation. |
|
DISRUPTION DUE TO CONSTRUCTION |
|||||||
Temporary increase in airborne dust levels due to construction activities |
N/A |
Insignificant |
Use of dust suppression techniques such as regular water spraying to minimise airborne dust load. Ensure that any pollution emitting plants are not located in the vicinity of a receptor unnecessary. |
Insignificant |
Short term |
No change from current situation. |
|
Decrease in air quality due to construction activities (at properties within 100 metres of existing and proposed A68 |
N/A |
Insignificant |
|||||
Damage to or disturbance of cultural heritage features (four identified within 100m). |
Local |
Major / Adverse |
Preventing access to cultural heritage feature by identifying sensitive features in contract documents and fencing off prior the onset of construction. Archaeological monitoring of any works that may cause subsurface damage and recording of any archaeological features discovered. Inclusion of ‘special requirements’ provided by Historic Scotland in contract documents and implementation of ‘special requirements’ during works |
Negligible |
Adverse |
No change from current situation. |
|
Disruption to access arrangements to land and property due to construction and temporary land take. |
Medium |
Slight / Adverse |
Financial agreement between contractor and land owner to compensate for temporary land take to facility construction compound. Reinstate temporary land take to its former use as quickly as possible. |
Slight |
Adverse/ Short term |
No change from current situation. |
|
Loss of access to Riggsyde during construction activities. |
Medium |
Negligible / Adverse |
Provide temporary access where access is disrupted during construction |
Negligible |
Adverse / Short term |
No change from current situation. |
|
Disturbance to Headshaw Burn during extension of the Annfield Bridge |
International |
Critical / Adverse |
Creation and implementation of Construction Method Statement (as per Habitat Regs requirements), application of sensitive construction techniques, no obstruction to banks or channels. Completion of a fish rescue. Application of British Standards. |
Slight |
Adverse, short term and possibly long term |
No change from current situation. |
|
Pollution of Headshaw Burn and other watercourses |
International |
Critical / Adverse |
Application of a Construction Method Statement outlining construction techniques to be applied and pollution control mitigation requirements. Authorisation under the CAR and application of licence conditions. Adherance to SEPA PPG Guidelines and WFD Engineering guidelines along with restrictions in timing of certain activities and consultation with SEPA. Implementation of SUD systems and improved drainage design. |
Slight |
Adverse, short and long term |
No change from current situation – risk of environmental damage due to pollution incident. |
|
Disturbance to otter (both within places of shelter and movement behaviour) and protected species due to construction. |
Clear demarkation of 10m zone around otter holt. Toolbox talks to contractors. Pre-construction survey of holt condition (natal status) and other potential new holts. Licence from SE. Minimisation of disturbance within 100m and restricted work programs / timings |
No change to existing conditions. |
|||||
Otter holt |
International |
Major / Adverse |
Slight |
Adverse |
|||
Otter movement / passage |
International |
Major / Adverse |
Slight |
Adverse |
|||
Disturbance due to human activity, noise, dust and light: |
Completion of pre-construction surveys, covering of culverts and excavations to avoid trapping of animals, ecological watching brief as required, sensitive timing of works (e.g. avoidance of breeding bird season), obtaining of licences to meet with legal requirements, dust suppression, application of an EMS and use of lighting minimised and directed away from sensitive receptors such as watercourses etc. |
Unchanged from current levels of disturbance from humans, dust, light and noise. |
|||||
Breeding birds |
Local |
Slight / Adverse |
Neutral |
N/A |
|||
Otters / bats |
International |
Slight / Adverse |
Neutral |
N/A |
|||
Badgers |
National |
Neutral |
Neutral |
N/A |
|||
Dust |
Not significant |
Neutral |
Neutral |
N/A |
|||
Light |
International to Local |
Neutral |
Neutral |
N/A |
|||
Visual impact during construction upon nearby properties and road users. |
Medium |
Moderate / Adverse |
Retention of existing vegetation; limit to size / extent of working and storage areas; good site management and housekeeping; limited use of temporary floodlighting. |
Moderate |
Adverse, short term |
No change to effect from existing A68. |
|
Noise and vibration impacts upon residential properties (Riggsyde and The Shieling) and wildlife. |
N/A |
Moderate / Adverse |
Inclusion of the following control measures within the EMS: Sensitive programming of works during normal working hours; Informing properties of duration and intensity of particularly noisy activities / processes; Adherence to standard noise levels set by SBC Environmental Health Officer; and Noisy activities timed for completion out with recognised breeding periods for sensitive species. |
Moderate |
Adverse, short term |
No change from existing conditions. |
|
Disruption to non-vehicle road users such as crossing of C83 and D47/5 junction, access to Carfraemill Hotel |
Low |
Negligible |
N/A - alternative provisions to be provided by the contractor. Best practice to include: Fencing off of works and provide clear signage. |
Negligible |
Short term |
Continued risk from crossing A68 at C83 and D47/5 junctions. No change to current hotel access arrangements. |
|
Impairment of driver views by construction works and floodlighting |
Medium |
Moderate / Adverse |
Limit size and extent of working areas; clear signage and traffic management; good site management and house keeping; advance notification via local radio and media of likely delays; and limited use of temporary floodlighting. |
Moderate |
Adverse, short term |
No change from existing condition / stress levels. |
|
Increased driver stress due to unfamiliar conditions / site plant presence and increase in journey times |
Medium |
Moderate / Adverse |
Limit size and extent of working areas; clear signage and traffic management; good site management and house keeping; advance notification via local radio and media of likely delays; and limited use of temporary floodlighting. |
Moderate |
Adverse, short term |
No change from existing condition / stress levels. |
|
Hydrological and water quality impacts upon the Headshaw Burn, Leader Water and associated catchment (e.g. construction disturbance and damage and accidental spillage) |
Very high |
Moderate to Large / Adverse |
Application of SEPA PPG’s; consultation with SEPA re. detailed drainage design; inclusion of EMS procedures for appropriate storage on site of materials, temporary pollution control, restricted access near watercourses and contingency plans for emergency situations. |
Slight |
Adverse, short and long term |
Continued existing risk from current A68 drainage and maintenance work requirements / accidental spillage. |
|
Impact upon groundwater sources |
Medium |
Neutral |
N/A |
Neutral |
N/A |
As existing conditions. |
|
Impact of importing fill material to site and associated disruption |
Low |
Slight / Adverse |
No mitigation required. Best practice includes: Limitations on the extent and location of working / storage areas; Implementation of erosion and sediment controls; Appropriate handling and storage of spoil; and Re-use of excavated materials. |
Slight |
Adverse |
No change to current situation |
|
Storage of material on site prior to replacement as fill material |
Low |
Negligible / Adverse |
No mitigation required. Best practice includes: Limitations on the extent and location of working / storage areas; Implementation of erosion and sediment controls; Appropriate handling and storage of spoil; and Re-use of excavated materials. |
Negligible |
Adverse |
No change to current situation |