13. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS TABLE

13. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS TABLE

This chapter presents the Environmental Impacts Table (Table 13.1) for the proposed scheme. The purpose of the Table is to present the main predicted impacts (taking account of agreed mitigation) in summarised form.

The table includes the following:

  • Description of the potential impact;
  • Mitigation objective and commitment;
  • Sensitivity/value of the receptor;
  • Duration of the impact;
  • Magnitude of the impact with mitigation in place; and
  • Significance of the impact with mitigation in place.

DMRB guidelines state that the 'do nothing' or ‘do minimum’ options should be included in the Environmental Impacts Table. However, in this particular circumstance, do nothing or do minimum would mean putting a weight restriction on the bridge which is not considered feasible as it is a main Trunk Route. Therefore, the ‘do nothing’ and ‘do minimum’ options have been omitted from this table.

The Environmental Impacts Table includes mitigation item numbers that can be cross referenced to specific mitigation measures in Table 14.1.

Table 13.1 Environmental Impacts Table

Potential Environmental Impact

Mitigation Item Number (refer to Table 13.1)

Sensitivity/ value of Receptor

Residual Impacts

Duration of Impact
(short/long term)

Magnitude of Impact
(after Mitigation)

Significance of Impact
(after Mitigation)

Geology and soils

Slight re-grading of embankment and drift-deposit slopes resulting in a slight loss of minerogenic material from the drift-deposit slopes and the covering and possible compaction of peat beneath the widened embankment slopes.

3, 4, 17

low

long term

minor

slight

Excavation of drift deposits will result in a small loss of minerogenic material and supporting soil, with associated localised changes to hydrology

1, 10, 15, 16, 52

low

short term

minor

negligible

Excavation of peat will result in a small loss of organic material, and a slight localised change to peat structure and hydrology.

1, 2, 5, 8, 9, 10,
12, 13, 14, 15,
16, 18, 52, 53

high

short and long term

minor

slight

The cutting of two moraines will result in a small loss of minerogenic material.

11, 12, 14

low

long term

minor

negligible

Disturbance of peat, through compaction and loss of structure caused by the movement of plant and construction staff around the site

67, 68, 71

high

long term

negligible

negligible

Road Drainage and the Water Environment

Sediment release from construction activities and bare areas of soil affecting water quality

13, 14, 15, 19,
20, 21, 22, 23,
24, 25, 26, 30,
33, 34, 68, 69,
70, 75, 77

high

short term

negligible

negligible

Coarse sediment delivery not removed by low competency river flow

13, 14, 15, 19,
20, 21, 22, 23,
24, 25, 26, 30,
33, 34, 68, 69,
70

high

long term

negligible

negligible

Sediment loading smothering habitats and affecting the breathing apparatus of fish and aquatic invertebrates

13, 14, 15, 19,
20, 21, 22, 23,
24, 25, 26, 30,
33, 34, 68, 69,
70, 75, 77

high

short term

negligible

negligible

Discolouration from silt and clay sedimentation

13, 14, 15, 19,
20, 21, 22, 23,
24, 25, 26, 30,
33, 34, 68, 69,
70

high

short term

negligible

negligible

Reduction of fish spawning ground from sediment filling voids

13, 14, 15, 19,
20, 21, 22, 23,
24, 25, 26, 30,
33, 34, 68, 69,
70

medium

long term

negligible

negligible

Introduction of coarse, angular, foreign sediment from the demolition of the bridge

19, 20, 21, 22,
25, 30, 34, 36,
37, 68, 70

high

long term

negligible

negligible

Delivery, storage and removal of large quantities of stone and aggregate may result in the transfer of some of the material to the river channel

15, 19, 20, 21,
22, 24, 26, 68,
69, 75

high

short term

negligible

negligible

Vehicle movement will transfer fine sediments around the site that could be washed into the channel

12, 19, 23, 24,
30, 33, 35, 75

high

short term

negligible

negligible

Ecology and Nature Conservation

~ 5 m2 of habitat loss

1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 12, 13, 14,
38,, 41, 43, 52,
53, 71, 75

medium

long term

minor

slight

Temporary impacts to wetland habitats from construction activities, including pollution, siltation, spray and runoff

19, 20, 21, 22,
23, 24, 25, 26,
28, 29, 30, 31,
32, 33, 34, 35,
36, 37, 67, 68,
69, 70, 75

high

short term

negligible

negligible

Fluvial and Aeolian deposition of construction materials onto semi-natural habitats

8, 10, 11, 12, 13,
15, 23, 45, 46,
49, 69, 75

medium

short term

negligible

negligible

Possible loss of trees

38, 39, 75, 78

medium

long term

moderate

slight

Disturbance to mammals (if present) by construction

39, 41, 42, 75,
76, 78

high (if present)

short term

minor

slight

Possible disturbance to aquatic wildlife

See water environment section above

very high

long term

minor

slight

Landscape and Visual

Disturbance to the tranquil character of the area by the presence and activities of major construction plant and workforce

42, 54, 55, 56,
57

high

short term

moderate

slight

Detraction from the natural landmarks and scenic beauty of the area

27, 43, 61, 64,
65, 73

high

short term

moderate

slight

Loss of roadside mire, heath, peat and drift deposits

As for geology, geomorphology and Soils section

medium

long term

minor

slight

Potential pollution of River and Loch Ba

As for Ecology and Nature Conservation section

high

short term

negligible

negligible

Very minor loss of moorland vegetation, minor loss of willow carr and individual birch and rowan adjacent to the bridge

As for Ecology and Nature Conservation section

medium

long term

minor

slight

Changes to the character of the area due to the use of new, non-local materials, particularly the concrete, tubular rail parapet and steel girders to support the new, wider bridge deck

74

high

long term

minor

slight

Disruption Due To Construction

Temporary requirement of some peatland/moorland for the temporary bridge and works

See Geology, Geomorphology and Soils section

high

short term

minor

slight

Some pedestrians and cyclist’s journeys within the vicinity of the proposed scheme will be longer, delayed, obstructed, noisier and subjected to a loss of amenity

58, 59, 60, 62,
63

low

short term

minor

slight

Pedestrians and others, if using the A82, will be proximal to plant, construction activities and motor vehicles whilst passing through the traffic management

67

low

short term

minor

slight

Parking and thus access to paths will be affected due to the location of the site compound

61

low

short term

minor

slight

Temporary alteration to drivers views

61, 62

high

short term

minor

slight

Increase in driver stress from construction activities and delays

58, 60, 61, 62,
63, 64, 66, 67

low

short term

minor

slight

Impacts on the water environment similar to those discussed above

As for Ecology and Nature Conservation section

high

short term

negligible

negligible

Planning Policies

No predicted impacts