Appendix C - Main Crossing Scheme Assessment Architectural Figures

This section is also available in pdf format (7.8mb)

Figure C.1 Alignment of the Three Bridges (Forth Replacement Crossing alignment shown in red)

Figure C.2 Concept Evolution

Figure C.3 Tower Shape – Concepts

Figure C.4 Needle Tower Development

Figure C.5 N1 Final Concept

Figure C.6 N2 Final Concept

Figure C.7 N1 Final Concept

Figure C.8 N2 Final Concept

Figure C.9 Needle Tower – Perspective View

Figure C.10 Inverted Y Tower Development

Figure C.11 Y1 Final Concept

Figure C.12 Y2 Final Concept

Figure C.13 Y1 Final Concept

Figure C.14 Y2 Final Concept

Figure C.15 Inverted Y Tower – Perspective View

Figure C.16 H-Tower Development

Figure C.17 H-Tower Final Concept

Figure C.18 H Shape Tower – Perspective View

Figure C.19 Comparison Needle Tower, Inverted Y Tower and H-shape Tower

Figure C.20 Needle Tower Aerial View

Figure C.21 Inverted Y Tower Aerial View

Figure C.22 H Shape Tower Aerial View

Figure C.23 Functional Cross Section Alternatives

Figure C.24 Two Plane Warren Truss

Figure C.25 Four Plane Warren Truss

Figure C.26 Two Plane Vierendeel Truss

Figure C.27 Three Corridor Approach Viaducts – Composite Option

Figure C.28 Three Corridor Approach Viaducts – Concrete Option

Figure C.29 Double Level Approach Viaducts – Four Plane Warren Truss

Figure C.30 Double Level Approach Viaducts – Two Plane Vierendeel Truss