3. Commercial, Financial and Management Case
3. Commercial, Financial and Management Case
The purpose of the Strategic Business Case is to provide a Rationale for Intervention and provide enough evidence for a scheme or project to be allowed to proceed to development. At this stage of the project, it would be inappropriate to develop detailed information on the commercial, financial, and management arrangements for particular interventions. The section below does, however, set out expectations for the criteria of each and how these will develop over time.
Once a clear Investment Case is established there will be a requirement to develop a robust Commercial Case. This will outline the proposed deal in relation to the preferred option or options identified by the Investment Case.
Procurement strategy
This strategy summarises the best way of achieving the objectives of the project and value for money, taking account of the risks and constraints, leading to decisions on the most appropriate funding mechanism and asset ownership of the High Speed cross-border railway. The aim of the procurement strategy is to achieve the optimum balance of risk, control and funding.
Through the development of the project to the Outline Business Case stage a number of procurement routes will be identified as having the potential to achieve the objectives of the project and value for money in accordance with the relevant guidance. The cost, risk and benefits associated with these routes will be analysed and presented to investment decision makers. The project could be financed in several ways, including capital grant financing, private financing, Network Rail Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) financing, or a combination of the three. In their recent report into high speed rail options Network Rail rule out the option of RAB financing based on the experiences of High Speed 1 (the Eurostar link) and similar international projects.
This financial case sets out the forecast cost and revenue implications of the preferred option (as set out in the investment case section), the proposed options for financing the costs as described in the commercial case, and the affordability impact . It will confirm whether the project is affordable to Transport Scotland and the Department for Transport. At this stage the cost to Government and the apportionment of the cost is unknown. This will be identified through the work-stream lead by High Speed 2 and subsequent negotiations between the UK and Scottish Governments. Evidence from Network Rail and Greengauge suggest the cost of constructing a dedicated high speed rail network, including cross-border line, will vary between £30 billion to over £100 billion, depending on alignments.
The impact on Transport Scotland’s income will be calculated by preparing an outline cost plan (OCP) which estimates all required capital and operational expenditure.
At this stage management arrangements are also unknown. As the scheme proceeds to development of an Outline Business Case the management case will be developed to set out the actions required to ensure the successful delivery of the scheme in accordance with best practice, and in a manner consistent with the procurement strategy established.
Project management arrangements
The nature of the project will require clear management arrangements, including roles and responsibilities, to be agreed with the Department for Transport. The project will, however, be managed in accordance with project management principles and practices as set out in the Association for Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK).
A Project Execution Plan (PEP) will be developed to ensure that planning, cost control, change control progress measurement and status reporting is managed with agreed processes and procedures.
As likely principle funders and authorised undertakers of the project, the Department for Transport and Transport Scotland will oversee the development of the programme and business case, and ensure these are maintained and developed throughout the life of the project.
Benefits realisation
Benefits realisation is central to the production of a business case. Achieving real benefits is the sovereign objective of any intervention, and that the pursuit of benefits should be the starting and end point of every stage of project development. At the Outline Business Case stage a benefits realisation plan will be developed to:
- Establish exactly what is to be evaluated and how it is to be measured; this should stem directly from the project objectives;
- Establish when benefits are to be evaluated. For long-term projects this should be an ongoing process, beginning six to twelve months after the scheme becomes operational, and continuing every four to five years until scheme closure;
- Define what resources are to be spent on the evaluation, whether there are any constraints on their availability, how long the evaluation process will take, and who will bear the cost; and
- Establish who will be responsible for carrying out the evaluation.
Outline arrangements for risk management
A risk management strategy will be developed which seeks to ensure the efficient use of resources and to minimise waste by ensuring that risk is allocated to the party best placed to manage it.
References
Aberdeen City Alliance, (2009), Single Outcome Agreement — 2009-10
Atkins, (2008) Because Transport Matters: High Speed Rail. London: Atkins.
Cushman and Wakefield, (2007), UK cities monitor
Dabinett (1998), Realizing regeneration benefits from urban infrastructure investments: lessons from Sheffield in the 1990s, Town Planning Review, 69, pp 171-189
Debrezion, G., et al., (2004), The impact of railway stations on residential and commercial property value, Tinbergen Institute discussion paper
Department for Transport, (2004), The importance of transport in business’ location decisions
Department for Transport, (2007a), Estimated carbon impact of a new North-South line, Booz Allen Hamilton report for the Department for Transport as part of the New Line Capacity Study, July 2007
Department for Transport, (2007b), Journey time run comparisons, CDL group report for the Department for Transport as part of the New Line Capacity Study, May 2007
Department for Transport, (2008), Productive use of rail travel time and the productive use of travel time savings for rail business travellers, (unpublished)
Dundee Partnership (2009), Single Outcome Agreement 2009-2012
Edinburgh Partnership (2009), Single Outcome Agreement 2009-12
Ernst & Young (2008), European Investment Monitor
European Commission, (2006), Air and Rail Competition and Complementarity, SDG report for the European Commission, August 2006
Eurostar, (2009) Eurostar & High Speed 1 — a perspective on HS2, Presentation at High Speed Networks 23rd April 2009
Glasgow Community Planning Partnership (2009), Single Outcome Agreement 2008
Greenpeace, (2009), "High speed rail announcement: Greenpeace response", Greenpeace press release, 5th August 2009
Greengauge 21 (2009a), High speed rail development programme 2008/09: Strategic Choices, Final report for workstream 2
Greengauge 21 (2009b), High speed rail development programme 2008/09: Network Scenarios, unpublished
Greengauge 21 (2009c), Fast Forward: A High-Speed Rail Strategy for Britain
International Congress and Convention Association (ICCA), (2008), Country and city rankings
Llewelyn-Davies et al., (2004), Transport and City Competitiveness, report for the Department for Transport
McQuaid et al. (2004), The importance of transport in business’ location decisions
Network Rail (2009a), New Lines Study: Strategic Business Case
Network Rail (2009b), Meeting the capacity challenge: The case for new lines
Network Rail (2009c), High speed rail investment; an overview of the literature, by the Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds
Office of National Statistics, (ONS), (2008), Annual Business Inquiry
Office of National Statistics, (ONS), (2009), Latest on Travel and Tourism, accessed at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=178, 15th October 2009
Scottish Chambers of Commerce et al., (2009) High Speed Rail: the case for Scotland, High Speed 2 Scotland, presented June 2009
Smith, Howard, (2002), Case study: DLR, regeneration and land value gains, Using land values to finance transport infrastructure, Conference Transcript, Waterfront Conference Company
Scottish Enterprise, Highlands and Islands Enterprise, the Scottish Government, and Transport Scotland, (2008), Transport infrastructure and services: industry views
Scottish Government (2007), The Government Economic Strategy
Scottish Government (2008a), Scottish Economic Statistics 2008
Scottish Government (2008b), National Planning Framework for Scotland 2
Turner, K. and Anson, S. (2009), Rebound and disinvestment effects in refined oil consumption and supply resulting from an increase in energy efficiency in the Scottish commercial transport sector, Energy Policy, (37), pp. 3608-3620
Visit Scotland (2008) Tourism in Scotland 2008
WWF, (2009), "Scotland must be part of new high-speed rail network" , WWF press release, 5th August 2009