Appendix B: Countermeasure Assessment
Appendix B: Countermeasure Assessment
Countermeasures were given a rating based on the confidence that the countermeasure would have been able to:
- Avoid the collision entirely
- Significantly reduce the severity of the collision (i.e reduce the fatality to at least serious injury)
The two aspects were assessed independently of each other and each given a score allowing a combined confidence score to be ascertained (See Table 2).
As both collison avoidance and severity reduction meet the aims of the countermeasure – that is to prevent the fatality – it is suitable to assess both together.
The following likelihood scale was used for countermeasure confidence:
- 0 = Not Applicable
- 1 = Possible
- 2= Likely
- 3 = Almost Certain
- 4= Certain
This resulted in a combined score of between 1 and 8, with higher rankings indicating a higher level of overall confidence that the countermeasure would have been appropriate and effective.
Example Countermeasure | Countermeasure Confidence Collision Avoidance | Countermeasure Confidence Severity Reduction | Combined Confidence Score |
---|---|---|---|
Use of seatbelt | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Better maintenance of vehicle consumables/features (brakes, tyres, lights etc.) | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS) | 4 | 4 | 8 |