National Roads Maintenance Review - Phase 2 Report
Appendix B Phase 1 recommendations and the strategic framework
Table 5 shows that each of the recommendations developed in Phase 1 are addressed by at least one of the proposed baseline developments of the strategic framework discussed in Section 3 of this report. In addition, some of the recommendations are also addressed by the enhanced developments in the strategic framework.
| Phase 1 Recommendations |
D1 Robust RAMP Planning |
D2 More than one provider |
D3 Outcome focused benchmarks and KPIs |
D4 Monitoring to show transparency |
D5 Appropriate incentive-isation |
D6 SMART targets |
D7 Continuous improvement/ innovation |
En8 Increased certainty of finance |
En9 Value-driven collaboration to deliver economies of scale |
En10 Enhanced scrutiny to ensure delivery of outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 - Reduce impediments to AM | Y | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| R2 - Lean | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Y | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| R3 - Implement RAMPs and prioritisation | Y | N/A | Y | N/A | N/A | Y | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| R4 - Prioritisation of asset types | Y | N/A | Y | N/A | N/A | Y | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| R5 - (a) Right KPIs, (b) Monitor KPIs | N/A | N/A | Y | Y | N/A | Y | Y | N/A | N/A | Y |
| R6 - Which model is best for local circumstances | N/A | Y | N/A | Y | N/A | N/A | Y | N/A | Y | N/A |
| R7 - Risk transfer | N/A | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| R8 - Rationalise standards and approvals | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Y | N/A | Y | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| R9 - Report on sharing with neighbours | N/A | Y | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Y | N/A |
| R10 - External (a) Backlog, (b) Steady state, (c) Economic importance | N/A | N/A | N/A | Y | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| R11 - Improve internal links | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Y | N/A | N/A | N/A |