Technical Standards & Data
Technical Standards
The technical standards advice and actions represent the working position of NSTAB on the core technical area of standards within Scotland, and considers this from a multi-modal timetable, fare and product/token perspective.
The advice and actions are based on two operational principles. Firstly, that wherever possible and appropriate, it is considered preferable to utilise and develop existing standards, rather than create new ones; and secondly it is considered preferable to integrate with existing platforms/services, where they are suitable and offer best value.
However, it also acknowledges that there may be a need for integrating services/software which may not presently exist through new approaches and standards.
Data and the Single Source of Truth (SST) Dataset
The data advice and actions represents the working position of NSTAB on the core area of Multi-Modal Journey & Product (including fares) data and considers this from a national muti-modal timetable development, timetable information, fares and retail perspective.
Central to this, is the recommendation to develop a “Single Source of Truth” (SST) multi-modal national transport dataset for Scotland to support Journey Planning, Customer Support, RTPI, Enhanced Customer Accessibility, Service Registrations and Product Retail. This approach aligns in part with the work being undertaken by Transport Scotland in this area.
Such a national SST dataset should include direct cross-border services including ferries to Northern Ireland; should support existing UK modal datasets where possible for bus, rail & coach services and support new modal datasets for Ferry, Metro and Tram services as applicable.
The national SST dataset should be capable of being available under open licence as a free national feed, as well as being ready to support commercial licensing with third party accredited product retailers.
It is considered essential that such an SST be developed and in place by the end of the Medium Term and desirable within 3 years.
Short Term Advisory Recommendations for Standards and Data
| Project Reference | Description | Priority | Cost | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STA1a | Create and publish a Standards Guide for Ticketing including devices, and continually monitor developing standards to refresh Standards Guide as appropriate | High | No | Not Applicable |
| STA2a | Engage with Members to define process for a Single Source of Truth (SST) National Transport Dataset | High | Low | Not Applicable |
Medium Term Advisory Recommendations for Standards and Data
| Project Reference | Description | Priority | Cost | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STA1b | Review and Refresh the Standards Guide for Ticketing based on developing standards and opportunities | High | Low | Not Applicable |
| STA2b | Develop the Single Source of Truth (SST) National Transport Dataset | High | Medium | Not Applicable |
| STA2c | Develop a Licensing Agreement of Single Source of Truth (SST) and issue for 3rd party product retail where commercially endorsed | High | Low | Income generating |
Long Term Advisory Recommendations for Standards and Data
| Project Reference | Description | Priority | Cost | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STA1c | Review and Refresh the Standards Guide for Ticketing based on developing standards and opportunities | High | Low | Not Applicable |
| STA2d | Maintain the Single Source of Truth (SST) National Transport Dataset | High | Low | Not Applicable |
| STA2e | Maintain the Licensing Agreement of Single Source of Truth (SST) 3rd party product retail | High | Medium | Not Applicable |
| STA3 | Review National Transport Strategy with inclusion of NSTAB work | High | No | Not Applicable |
Standards and Advisory Recommendations for Individual Product Types
In relation to the retailing of individual product types, it is advised that for at least the Short to Medium Term, Customers should be supported to use their ‘token’ of choice – be it ITSO Smart / Other Smart / Barcode / QR Code / cEMV / ABT and Paper where this is the preference of the Scheme Owner.
To enable this, it is important that the standards to do so are defined, and in support of Action 1.1 are maintained over time. With many such standards either new or in development, it is important these are monitored and contributed to as applicable. As such, the required Technical Standards and the advisory recommendations for each of the main product types are shown below on a token by token basis.
Account Based Ticketing (ABT)
The Standards to underpin the ongoing support for and development of an ABT Back Office are as follows:
- Back office to back office APIs (open) – TBC - New
- Industry Standard Retail APIs for front office retail
- PCI (latest version) – PCI Council
- Entitlement validation APIs (open) – New with external system
- Front Office Device (FOD) Standard (Open APIs) – TBC New
- Reporting APIs and/ or reporting capabilities (open) – TBC - New
- A set of clear requirements & business rules covering as a minimum:
- List Management
- User-friendly names
- Product Management
- Settlement & Apportionment
- Journey construction & product selection
- Key management & business rules
For the ABT Middle Office, the Standards required include:
- Front Office Device (FOD) – TBC - New
- PCI (latest version) – PCI Council
- ITSO HOPS (ITSO only) - ITSO
- Retail APIs (open) – TBC – New
- A set of clear requirements & business rules covering as a minimum:
- List Management
- Monitoring APIs (open)
- Key management
Short Term Advisory Recommendations for ABT
|
Project Reference |
Description |
Priority |
Cost |
Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ABT1 |
Work with ScotRail and operators of other modes to outline options to progress Barcode PAYG on additional modes via TF2 standard |
Low |
Low |
Liaise with ScotRail |
|
ABT2a |
Map out core principles of Nationwide Shared Multi-operator / Multi-modal ABT Platform supporting multiple token types, multiple product owner products, discounted travel and entitlement based travel. Prepare procurement Specification. |
High |
Low |
Not Applicable |
|
ABT3 |
Engage with Schemes which already support cEMV to develop trials of interoperable areas |
Medium |
Medium |
Not Applicable |
|
ABT4 |
Continue engagement with RDG re: Tap Aggregator on rail, and Project Coral - Tap Aggregator on Bus |
High |
No |
Not Applicable |
|
ABT7a |
Procure, develop and maintain the ABT Back Office in line with the following Standards: 1. Back office to back office APIs (open) – TBC - New |
High |
No/Low |
Not Applicable |
|
ABT8a |
Procure, develop and maintain the ABT Middle Office in line with the following Standards: 1. FOD – TBC - New |
High |
No/Low |
Not Applicable |
Medium Term Advisory Recommendations for ABT
|
Project Reference |
Description |
Priority |
Cost |
Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ABT2b |
Procure and Implement a Nationwide Shared Multi-operator / Multi-modal ABT Platform supporting multiple token types, multiple product owner products, discounted travel and entitlement based travel. Also - See PCR2 |
High |
Medium / High |
Not Applicable |
|
ABT5 |
Integrate with RDG re: Tap Aggregator on rail, and Project Coral - Tap Aggregator as relevant or develop own based on BCR's |
High |
Medium |
Not Applicable |
|
ABT7b |
Continue to maintain and develop the Technical Standards of the ABT Back Office in line with ABT7a. |
High |
No/Low |
Not Applicable |
|
ABT8b |
Continue to maintain and develop the Technical Standards of the ABT Middle Office in line with ABT8a. |
High |
No/Low |
Not Applicable |
Long Term Advisory Recommendations for ABT
| Project Reference | Description | Priority | Cost | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABT2c | Maintain and enhance Nationwide Shared Multi-operator / Multi-modal ABT Platform supporting multiple token types | High | Medium | Not Applicable |
| ABT6 | Reduce token types as they become inefficient / no longer desired by the customer based on monitoring and research of token types | High | No | Not Applicable |
| ABT7c | Refine, Reduce, Enhance the ABT Back Office Technical Standards applicable under ABT7b. | High | No/Low | Not Applicable |
| ABT8c | Refine, Reduce, Enhance the ABT Middle Office Technical Standards applicable under ABT8b. | High | No/Low | `Not Applicable |
Barcode and QR Code Ticketing
The Standards to underpin the ongoing support for and development of Barcode and QR Code Ticketing are as follows:
- National Multi modal barcode/QR code standard – TF2
- Rail barcode - RDG
- Bus barcode - TBC
- List Management (accept and deny) – Requirement
- Near real-time comms - Requirement
Short Term Advisory Recommendations for Barcodes / QR Codes
| Project Reference | Description | Priority | Cost | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAR1a | Promote / Support a White Label shared approach for all SME modes to retail via Barcodes | Medium | Low | Brand at RTP Level |
| BAR2a | Develop & Test TF2 interoperable Barcode Specification available to all Suppliers on an open licence basis including throughput timing tests | High | Low | Not Applicable |
| BAR3a | Promote consolidated App(s) offering Multiple single modal or operator product retailing - as data suitability improves | High | Low / Medium | Not Applicable |
| BAR4 | Research ability for Barcodes to acquire and manage entitlement (concessions) eligibility digitally | High | Low | Not Applicable |
| BAR5a | Work with Transport Scotland / NECPO to develop Business Case & Legal Amendments for Rolling out Barcode based entitlement (concessions) supported by BAR2 where possible | Medium | Low | Not Applicable |
| BAR6 | Increase Barcode scanning capability across operators and modes within Scotland | Medium | Medium | Not Applicable |
| BAR7 | Develop PlusBus on Barcodes based on TF2 Specification. | Low | No | ScotRail are working on this - but not necessarily on TF2 standard. |
Medium Term Advisory Recommendations for Barcodes / QR Codes
| Project Reference | Description | Priority | Cost | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAR1b | Roll out White Label approach for all SME modes to retail via Barcodes | High | Low | Not Applicable |
| BAR2b | Make BAR2 interoperable Barcode Specification available to all Suppliers on an open licence basis | High | Low / Medium | Not Applicable |
| BAR3b | Encourage the uptake of consolidated App(s) offering Multiple single and multi-modal product retailing based on SST dataset via Traveline Scotland and/or others and utilising TF2 Standard | High | Low | Not Applicable |
| BAR5b | Support the Rolling out of Barcode based entitlement (concessions) where desired | High | Low | Not Applicable |
Contactless Europay Mastercard Visa (cEMV) Ticketing
The Standards to underpin the ongoing support for and development of cEMV Ticketing are as follows:
- RDG EMV Tokenisation - RDG
- EMV Level 1-2 (3 as part of overall solution) - EMV
- PCI (latest version) – PCI Council
- Mass Transit Ticketing (MTT) - EMV
- UKCA Models 2 and 3 – UKCA
- Front Office Device interface standards – TBC – New
- List Management (accept and deny) – Requirement
Short Term Advisory Recommendations for cEMV
|
Project Reference |
Description |
Priority |
Cost |
Comments |
|
EMV1 |
Consult upon & develop a business case for a support programme to equip vehicles and stations with cEMV and Tap Off Readers across modes including rail |
High |
No |
Not Applicable |
|
EMV2 |
Develop and Implement a support programme to equip vehicles and stations with cEMV and Tap Off Readers across modes including rail |
High |
Low |
Not Applicable |
|
EMV3 |
Investigate and align with emerging standards and processes, and to work with existing cEMV-based schemes and operators |
High |
Low |
Not Applicable |
|
EMV4a |
Identify opportunities for efficiency gain - such as shared / single PSP provision |
High |
Low |
Not Applicable |
|
EMV5a |
Monitor current developments of cEMV token registration for discounted travellers |
Medium |
No |
Not Applicable |
|
EMV6 |
Research & Develop ability for cEMV to acquire and manage entitlement (concessions) eligibility digitally |
High |
Low |
Not Applicable |
|
EMV7 |
Engage with Schemes to develop trials of interoperable areas |
Medium |
Medium |
Not Applicable |
|
EMV9a |
Maintain and develop cEMV in line with the following Standards: 1. RDG EMV Tokenisation - RDG |
High |
No/Low |
Not Applicable |
Medium Term Advisory Recommendations for cEMV
| Project Reference | Description | Priority | Cost | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMV4b | Deliver identified efficiency gains - such as shared / single PSP provision | High | Medium | Not Applicable |
| EMV8 | Use emerging standards and processes as basis for open cEMV platform across modes | High | Medium | Not Applicable |
| EMV9b | Continue to maintain and develop the Technical Standards for cEMV in line with EMV9a. | High | No/Low | Not Applicable |
Long Term Advisory Recommendations for cEMV
| Project Reference | Description | Priority | Cost | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMV4c | Enhance shared efficiency gains - such as single PSP provision etc | High | No | Not Applicable |
| EMV5b | Open cEMV platform across modes for ABT - aligned with ABT2 | High | Medium / High | Not Applicable |
| EMV9c | Refine, Reduce, Enhance the cEMV Technical Standards applicable under EMV9b. | High | No/Low | Not Applicable |
ITSO Smartcard Ticketing
The Standards to underpin the ongoing support for and development of ITSO Smartcard Ticketing are as follows:
- Upgrade to 1.5 of the ITSO Specification
- Upgrade to V4 ISAMs as a minimum
- Maintaining rail ITSO standards – such as RSP3002
ITSO is already the core platform for entitlement ticketing on bus and ferry services, and with the new ITSO Specification available, as well as ITSO on Mobile opportunities, it is considered there is no need to include longer term advisory recommendations at this time.
Short Term Advisory Recommendations for ITSO Smartcards
| Project Reference | Description | Priority | Cost | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITS1a | Review the ITSO supply arrangements for the concessions scheme to ensure continuity of supply | Low | No | Not Applicable |
| ITS2a | Fully identify and implement where appropriate realistic plans for ITSO on Mobile on both Android and iOS platforms for all product types | High | Medium | Not Applicable |
| ITS3a | Ensure upgrade to ITSO Spec v2.1.5 across all ITSO estate elements | High | Low / Medium | Not Applicable |
| ITS4a | Upgrade ISAMs to v4 | High | Low / Medium | Not Applicable |
| ITS5 | Source / Build IP67 Readers for ITSO use on Ferries | Medium | Low | Not Applicable |
| ITS6a | Encourage migration of remaining non-ITSO Smartcards to ITSO Smartcards | High | Low | Not Applicable |
| ITS7 | Encourage migration to cEMV / Barcode where viable and suitable | Low | No | Not Applicable |
Medium Term Advisory Recommendations for ITSO Smartcards
| Project Reference | Description | Priority | Cost | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITS1b | Secure through effective standards led procurement the ITSO supply arrangements for the entitlement Scheme to ensure continuity of supply | High | No | Not Applicable |
| ITS2b | Business Case and BCR roll out of ITSO on Mobile (Android & Apple) for entitlement and commercial product types | Medium | Low / Medium | Not Applicable |
| ITS3b | Upgrade to ITSO Spec v2.1.5 across all elements and deliver value from the upgrade. | High | No / Low | Not Applicable |
| ITS4b | Maximise value from upgrading ISAMs to v4 | High | No / Low | Not Applicable |
| ITS6b | Conclude migration of non-ITSO Smartcards to ITSO Smartcards | High | No / Low | Not Applicable |