Transport Scotland Scottish Trunk Road Infrastructure Project Evaluation Evaluation Report for Trunk Road Projects Opened between April 07 and March 09

A APPENDIX A: EVALUATIONS FOR PROJECTS THAT OPENED BETWEEN APRIL 07 AND MARCH 09

A.8 A77(T) HAGGSTONE

A.8.1 Introduction

Project Overview

The project involved the construction of a 1.0 kilometre long climbing lane on the northbound carriageway of the A77(T), approximately four kilometres north of the Cairnryan ferry terminal.

The general location of the project is shown in Figure A.8a.

The A77(T) Haggstone project was officially opened to traffic on 22nd December 2008.

Project Objectives

The objectives of the A77(T) Haggstone project were set as follows:

  • to improve and increase the number of overtaking opportunities to eradicate the conflicts between long distance users and local / agricultural traffic;
  • to improve the operational performance and level of services and safety on the A77(T) by reducing the effects of driver stress and journey times by constructing dedicated overtaking sections designed to break up the effects of convoys / platoons;
  • to maintain the asset value of the A77(T) route;
  • to mitigate the environmental impact of the new works where possible; and
  • to achieve good value for money for both taxpayers and transport users.

Evaluation Methodology

The A77(T) Haggstone project has been evaluated against the above objectives and the following criteria:

  • Environment;
  • Safety;
  • Economy;
  • Costs to Government; and
  • Value for Money.

As the evaluation focuses on impacts relating to the project objectives, specific evaluations against the Integration and Accessibility & Social Inclusion criteria have not been undertaken.

Figure A.8a A77(T) Haggstone

Figure A.8a A77(T) Haggstone

The evaluation is supported by the consideration of network traffic indicators, including traffic volumes, overtaking opportunities and travel times presented in the following section.

A.8.2 Network Traffic Indicators

Traffic Volumes

The location of the Automatic Traffic Counter (ATC) within the study area is shown in Figure A.8a.

Comparison Between Pre and Post Opening Traffic Flows

The Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) flows pre and post project opening on the A77(T) within the study area are presented in Table A.8.1.

Table A.8.1: A77(T) Haggstone - ATC Data

Table A.8.1: A77(T) Haggstone - ATC Data
ATC Reference AADT by Year
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
A77(T) at Auchencrosh
ATC08527 3,196 3,205 3,164 Year of
Opening
3,079 3,113 3,066

A comparison between pre and post opening traffic volumes on the A77(T) at Auchencrosh indicates that traffic flows in 2009 were around 100 vehicles per day (vpd) (4%) lower than 2005 flow levels. Traffic volumes between 2009 and 2011 were broadly consistent.

Given the nature of the A77(T) Haggstone project, changes in traffic levels are not likely to be as a consequence of changes to the carriageway standard and may be as a result of reductions in traffic volumes across the wider trunk road network due to the economic downturn experienced during the evaluation period.

Comparison Between Predicted and Actual Traffic Flows

The opening year flow comparisons for the A77(T) Haggstone project is based on AADT flows from 2009 as this was the first full year of reliable traffic data available from Transport Scotland's traffic counter within the study area.

As part of the project's appraisal, National Road Traffic Forecasts (NRTF) low and high growth factors were applied to the observed 2004 base year traffic flows to derive opening and future modelled assessment year traffic flows.

Predicted traffic flows for 2009 were derived by interpolating between the modelled assessment year, design network flows.

A summary of the actual and predicted traffic data is shown in Table A.8.2 below.

Table A.8.2: A77(T) Haggstone - Traffic Analysis Summary

Table A.8.2: A77(T) Haggstone - Traffic Analysis Summary
ATC
Ref
Actual AADT* Predicted AADT % Difference
(Predicted - Actual) / Actual
Low 60/40 High Low 60/40 High
A77(T) at Auchencrosh
ATC08527 3,079 3,481 3,523 3,586 13.0% 14.4% 16.5%

* 2009 flows (first full year of ATC data available)

The comparison between predicted and actual AADT flows in Table A.8.2 indicates that the predicted 2009 flow (derived by interpolating between the modelled assessment year traffic flows) was 13% and 17% greater than the observed 2009 flows under low and high traffic forecast scenarios respectively.

Whilst the comparison indicates that traffic growth on the A77(T) has fallen short of the assumed NRTF forecasts, the difference is within accepted limits. It is recognised that there has been a general fall in traffic volumes across the wider trunk road network in recent years due to the economic downturn that may in part account for the difference.

Changes in Irish Sea Ferry operations since the original assessment in 2004 coupled with an overall reduction in the total number of cars using the ferry services of approximately 11.5% between 2004 and 2009 (Ref. Scottish Transport Statistics No 29: 2010 Edition), which may also have resulted in a redistribution of traffic and also have contributed to observed flows being lower than forecast.

Carriageway Standard Assessment

In order to satisfy the project objectives, a climbing lane was constructed on the A77(T) at Haggstone as part of a series of improvements along the route, providing dedicated overtaking opportunities to help reduce platooning (seen as a particular issue on this route due to the nature of ferry traffic) as well as to reduce journey times and improve journey time reliability.

An assessment of the carriageway standard according to TA 46/97 - Economic Assessment and Recommended Flow Ranges for New Rural Road Links, which applied at the time of the project design, is shown in Table A.8.3 based on the observed 2009 traffic flow.

Table A.8.3: A77(T) Haggstone - Assessment of Carriageway Standard (TA 46/97)

Table A.8.3: A77(T) Haggstone - Assessment of Carriageway Standard (TA 46/97)
Opening Year AADT* TA 46/97 Standard Constructed Standard
3,079 Single 2-Lane Climbing Lane

* 2009 flows (first full year of ATC data available)

The carriageway assessment indicates that the observed 2009 flow lies within the flow range appropriate for a single 2-lane standard of carriageway. There are no specific flow ranges for the justification of a climbing lane given in TA 46/97 and, given the project objectives, the nature of traffic on the route and the surrounding topography, the constructed carriageway standard is considered appropriate.

Overtaking Opportunities

Comparison Between Pre and Post Opening Overtaking Opportunities

A post opening overtaking survey was undertaken on the A77(T) in November 2011 to provide an indication of conditions at Haggstone.

The pre and post opening surveys recorded the number of overtaking manoeuvres, platooning and vehicle speeds on the A77(T) in both directions of travel within the direct vicinity of the project and on the single carriageway sections on approach to the project's location.

The results from the post opening survey were compared against the results from a pre opening survey undertaken in March 2004 to provide an indication of the effect that the project has had on overtaking conditions.

The level of overtaking pre and post opening is shown in Table A.8.4 below.

Table A.8.4: A77(T) Haggstone - Level of Overtaking

Table A.8.4: A77(T) Haggstone - Level of Overtaking
AM Survey Period PM Survey Period
Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound
Pre Opening 18% 10% 21% 12%
Post Opening 44% 11% 45% 8%

The percentage of northbound vehicles that carried out an overtaking manoeuvre during the pre opening AM and PM survey periods was 18% and 21% respectively, which can be compared to 44% and 45% respectively during the post opening survey. This indicates that the A77(T) Haggstone project has increased overtaking in the northbound direction of travel.

In the southbound direction, 10% and 12% of all southbound vehicles that travelled through the survey site during the pre opening AM and PM survey periods respectively carried out an overtaking manoeuvre, which can be compared against 11% and 8% respectively during the post opening survey.

The project does not appear to have significantly affected the level of overtaking across the survey site in the southbound direction of travel in spite of the restriction on overtaking in this direction over the climbing lane section and indicates that opportunistic overtaking continues to occur over the sections of single carriageway within the vicinity of the project.

As a consequence of the increased overtaking in the northbound direction, a greater number of platoons were dispersed over the survey site post opening compared to the level of platoons dispersed during the pre opening survey.

The level of platoons dispersed over the survey site in the southbound direction during the survey periods were generally consistent between the pre and post opening surveys, which suggests that the project has not significantly affected the dispersal of platoons in the southbound direction.

Travel Times

Comparison Between Pre and Post Opening Travel Times

Mean vehicle speeds during the AM and PM survey periods, estimated from the information collected as part of the pre and post opening overtaking surveys, have been used as a proxy for changes in travel times.

A comparison between the mean vehicle speeds observed during the pre and post opening overtaking surveys is shown in Table A.8.5.

Table A.8.5: A77(T) Haggstone- Assessment of Mean Vehicle Speeds (mph)

Table A.8.5: A77(T) Haggstone- Assessment of Mean Vehicle Speeds (mph)
AM Survey Period PM Survey Period
Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound
Pre Opening 49 52 52 49
Post Opening 52 50 51 50

The comparison between mean vehicle speeds over the extents of the survey site indicate that speeds in both directions of travel have not been significantly affected by the A77(T) Haggstone project.

A.8.3 Environment

Review of Environmental Mitigation Measures

The environmental mitigation measures originally proposed for the A77(T) Haggstone project were obtained from the project's Environmental Statement.

A review of the environmental mitigation measures was carried out in April 2010, which confirmed that the majority of measures committed within the Environmental Statement were in place and were providing appropriate levels of mitigation.

Noise and Air Quality

Given the rural nature of the A77(T) Haggstone project and its limited effect on mean vehicle speeds, no significant impact on noise and air quality is expected. It is therefore not appropriate to evaluate the project's impact on noise and air quality.

Environment: Key Findings

The review of mitigation measures implemented for the A77(T) Haggstone project confirmed that the majority of measures committed within the Environmental Statement were in place. Whilst some variations from the proposed mitigation measures had been identified, these were not considered to have had a material detrimental impact on the general integration of the project into its surrounding.

A.8.4 Safety

Accidents

Comparison Between Pre and Post Opening Personal Injury Accident Numbers

The locations and severities of personal injury accidents occurring within the vicinity of the A77(T) Haggstone project 3 years before and 1 year after project completion are shown in Figures A.8b and A.8c.

A summary of the personal injury accident data is shown in Table A.8.6.

Table A.8.6: A77(T) Haggstone - Personal Injury Accident Data Summary

Table A.8.6: A77(T) Haggstone - Personal Injury Accident Data Summary
Period Fatal Serious Slight Total Accidents
3 Years Before
A77(T) 0 0 1 1
1 Year After
A77(T) 0 0 0 0

Figure A.8b A77(T) Haggstone

Figure A.8b A77(T) Haggstone

Figure A.8c A77(T) Haggstone

Figure A.8c A77(T) Haggstone

As can be seen from Table A.8.6, no personal injury accidents occurred in the 1 year period following the opening of the project in comparison to one personal injury accident (slight) in the 3 years before opening, suggesting a potential improvement in road safety.

Road Safety Audits

The Stage 4 Road Safety Audit (RSA) was carried out in October 2010. The RSA report confirmed that no accidents occurred within the vicinity of the project within the period 1 year after opening.

Safety: Key Findings

An assessment of the 1 year post opening personal injury accidents and a review of the Stage 4 RSA report, suggests that the A77(T) Haggstone project is operating safely.

A.8.5 Economy

Transport Economic Efficiency

Comparison Between Predicted and Actual Traffic Flows

The A77(T) Haggstone and A77(T) Glen App projects were constructed under a single contract with a single outturn cost. Accordingly the evaluation under the economy and cost to government criteria considers the collective performance of the projects.

The comparison between predicted and actual traffic flows, presented in sections A.8.2 and A.9.2, can be considered a proxy for whether the predicted economic benefits of the combined projects are likely to be realised.

The comparison indicates that the predicted 2009 flow was up to 17% greater than the observed 2009 flow on the A77(T). This overestimation is likely due to the combination of changes in Irish Sea Ferry operations and general economic downturn.

Economy: Key Findings

A difference between predicted and actual AADT flows of this magnitude suggests that the economic benefits of the combined projects will have been overestimated due to external factors that could not have readily been foreseen at the time of assessment.

A.8.6 Cost to Government

Investment Costs

Comparison Between Predicted and Out-turn Costs

The A77(T) Haggstone and Glen App projects were constructed under a single contract with a single out-turn cost. The predicted project costs used in the economic assessment of each project have been combined to allow the comparison between predicted and out‑turn costs to be undertaken.

The combined out-turn and predicted project costs for both A77(T) projects are shown in Table A.8.7. This confirms that the out-turn cost of the two A77(T) projects was approximately £3.2m (22%) lower than the predicted cost.

Table A.8.7: A77(T) Haggstone & Glen App - Project Cost Summary

Table A.8.7: A77(T) Haggstone & Glen App - Project Cost Summary
Out-turn Cost Predicted Cost Difference (Out-turn - Pred)
@ April 10 Mid-98 Prices in
1998 at 3.5% Discount
June 07 Prices Mid-98 Prices in
1998 at 3.5% Discount
Mid-98 Prices in
1998 at 3.5% Discount
Total £20,758,541 £11,486,943 £26,129,190 £14,736,160 -£3,249,257 (22%)

Cost to Government: Key Findings

The combined out-turn cost of the two A77(T) projects is approximately £3.2m (22%) lower than was predicted.

A.8.7 Value for Money

Initial Indications

The economic appraisal results predicted a combined Net Present Value (NPV) of -£9.69m and Benefit to Cost Ratio (BCR) of 0.54 under the 60/40 traffic forecast scenario.

Based on the comparisons presented in sections A.8.5 and A.8.6, which suggest that the benefits will have been overestimated and indicate that the cost is lower than predicted, the NPV and BCR of the combined projects are unlikely to be significantly greater than predicted.

Value for Money: Key Findings

The NPV and BCR of the combined A77(T) projects are unlikely to be significantly greater than predicted at the time of assessment, although it is judged that the projects will continue to provide a benefit to road users and will help encourage economic development within south west Scotland and beyond.

A.8.8 Achievement of Objectives

As specific indicators to measure the performance of the A77(T) Haggstone project against its objectives have not been developed, an initial indication of how the project is progressing towards achieving its objectives is based on the pre opening data available, supplemented by post opening data collected as part of the evaluation.

Initial Indications

A summary of the evaluation, providing an indication of how the A77(T) Haggstone project is progressing towards achieving its objectives, is presented in Table A.8.8.

Table A.8.8: A77(T) Haggstone - Progress Towards Achieving Objectives

Table A.8.8: A77(T) Haggstone - Progress Towards Achieving Objectives
Objective Commentary Progress
Improve and increase the number of overtaking opportunities to eradicate the conflicts between long distance users and local / agricultural traffic. A comparison between the results of the pre and post overtaking surveys indicate that the provision of a dedicated overtaking opportunity has increased overtaking in the northbound direction of travel.

In the southbound direction, despite the restricted overtaking section, the pre and post overtaking surveys indicate that there has been little impact as opportunistic overtaking still exists on the single carriageway sections to the north and south of the project.
+ve
Improve the operational performance and level of services and safety on the A77(T) by reducing the effects of driver stress and journey times by constructing dedicated overtaking sections designed to break up the effects of convoys / platoons. Although mean vehicle speeds in both directions of travel have not been significantly affected by the A77(T) Haggstone project, a comparison between the results of the pre and post overtaking surveys indicate that as a consequence of the increased overtaking in the northbound direction, a greater number of platoons are dispersed.

An assessment of the 1 year post opening personal injury accidents and a review of the Stage 4 RSA report, suggests that the A77(T) Haggstone project is operating safely.
+ve
Maintain the asset value of the A77(T) route. Given the nature of the A77(T) Haggstone project, which involved replacing 1.8 kilometres of existing single carriageway with 1.0 kilometre of climbing lane and 0.8 kilometres of on-line improvements, the asset value of the A77(T) between the project tie-in points is likely to have increased thus maintaining the value of the route. +ve
Mitigate the environmental impact of the new works where possible. The majority of measures committed within the Environmental Statement are in place. Whilst some variations from the proposed mitigation measures have been identified, these are not considered to have had a material detrimental impact on the general integration of the project into its surrounding. +ve
Achieve good value for money for both taxpayers and transport users. Although the NPV and BCR are unlikely to be significantly greater than predicted at the time of assessment, the Haggstone and Glen App projects form part of a series of improvements along the A77(T) corridor that can be expected to provide benefits to transport users and help encourage economic development within south west Scotland and beyond. =

Key:
+ve Initial indication(s) that objective may be achieved

= Progress towards achievement of objective cannot be confirmed

O Initial indication(s) that objective may not be achieved