Article 2: Contributory Factors

Article 2: Contributory Factors

Article 2. Contributory factors to reported road accidents

Summary

This article describes the scope and limitations of the information on contributory factors collected as part of the road accident reporting system and presents Scottish results from the fourteenth year of collection.

  • Driver/rider errors or reactions were reported in 90% of all reported accidents with failed to look properly the most common type (involved in 30%).
  • Travelling too fast for the conditions or excessive speed was reported in 9% of all reported accidents and 20% of fatal accidents.
  • Pedestrian only factors were reported in 20% of fatal accidents whilst loss of control and failed to look properly were the most frequently reported driver/rider factors (involved in 32% and 25% of fatal accidents respectively).

1. Introduction

1.1 From 2005, all police forces across Great Britain reported contributory factors as part of the stats19 collection. These were developed to provide insight into why and how road accidents occur. Their aim is to help identify the key actions and failures that led directly to the actual impact, to aid investigation of how it might have been prevented. Care should always be taken when interpreting the factors as they:

  • reflect the reporting officer’s opinion at the time of reporting the accident (or the opinion of a person whose duties include deciding which CFs should be recorded based on the officer’s report).
  • are based on the information which was available at that time, so may not be the result of subsequent extensive investigation (indeed, subsequent enquiries could result in the reporting officer opinion changing).

1.2 A reporting office attending the scene of a road accident may select up to 6 contributory factors (from a list of 77) to assign to that accident. Multiple factors may be listed against any participant or vehicles in the accident, (therefore percentages in the tables provided may not sum to 100).

1.3 Because of this, analysis of contributory factor information requires careful consideration; figures will differ depending on the focus of the analysis. Care should be taken when interpreting tables provided here which consider different aspects of the data (i.e. accidents, vehicles/participants, casualties and frequencies).

1.4 This article presents analysis from accidents in Scotland reported to the police in 2019, with the following background note describing the collection of the contributory factor system in more detail.

1.5 Note that most tables are by individual contributory factor so care needs to be taken when carrying out analysis. Adding together numbers for individual contributory factors will result in some double counting e.g. some accidents will have 'exceeding speed limit' and 'driving too fast for the conditions' recorded as a factor.

2. Accidents

Categories

2.2 Each of the 77 contributory factors fits into one of nine categories. Figure 11 shows the percentage of accidents reported to the police with associated contributory factors in each these categories.

  • Driver/rider error was the most frequently reported category for each type of severity of accident and was reported in 90% of accidents reported to the police).
  • Pedestrian contributory factors (where the factor has been attributed to an injured or uninjured pedestrian involved in the accident), were reported in 19% of reported accidents, rising to 20% of fatal accidents.
  • Injudicious action (including travelling too fast for conditions, following too close or exceeding speed limit) was involved in 25% of all reported accidents and 24% of fatal accidents.
  • Road environment factors were reported in 20% of reported accidents.

Figure 11: Contributory factor type: Reported accidents by severity, 2019

Figure 11: Contributory factor type: Reported accidents by severity, 2019

Factors

2.3 On average there were two contributory factors listed per reported accident with more factors recorded for fatal accidents and fewer for slight accidents. Table M shows the numbers (and percentages) of reported accidents in which each contributory factor was reported.

  • Failed to look properly was the most frequently reported contributory factor, involved in 30 % of all reported accidents. This was followed by failed to judge other person’s path/speed (17%), loss of control and Careless/reckless or in a hurry ( both 14%), poor turn/manoeuvre (11%) and Slippery road (10%), were also in the top six.
  • Travelling too fast for the conditions or excessive speed was reported in 9% of all reported accidents and 20% of fatal accidents (Note that the individual percentages for each of these factors cannot simply be added together to obtain combined totals.)
  • For fatal accidents, loss of control was the most frequently reported driver/rider factor involved in 32% of accidents. Failed to look properly was reported in 25%, poor turn or manoeuvre and careless / reckless /in a hurry (both in 17%) and exceeding the speed limit in 13%. Pedestrian failed to judge vehicles path or speed and Pedestrian wearing dark clothing at night were involved in 12% and 8% of fatal accidents respectively.

2.4 Table M also shows how the incidence of some CFs varies with the severity of the accident. For example: loss of control is cited in 14% of all accidents for which CFs were recorded but 32% of fatal accidents; slippery road due to weather is cited in 10% of all accidents but 6% of fatal ones; failed to look properly is cited in 30% of all accidents but 25% of fatal ones and exceeding speed limit is cited in 4% of all accidents but 13% of fatal ones.

2.5 Note that repeats of the same contributory factor within an accident are excluded from the table, however an accident will appear more than once if more than one different contributory factor is reported.

Changes over time

2.6 Table N compares the top ten contributory factors listed in 2019 against previous years. These top ten factors remained the same in all five years, though the order and frequency changed over the 14 years of collection.

3. Vehicle & pedestrians

3.1 Table O shows the number and percentage of vehicles assigned each type of contributory factor (for each vehicle involved in an accident reported to the police). Table P shows this for pedestrians only.

3.2 Tables O & P show that:

  • Failed to look properly was the most frequently reported factor both overall (reported in 17% of all vehicles’ factors), and for every vehicle except motorcyclists.
  • Loss of control (22%) was the most commonly reported factor for motorcyclists.
  • Failed to judge other person’s path/speed was the second most common factor reported for cars or taxis (10%).
  • Failed to judge other person’s speed was the second most common factor associated with cyclists (associated with 7% of bicycles).
  • Failed to judge other person’s speed/path was the second most common factor reported for good vehicles (reported in 13%).
  • Travelling too fast for the conditions was associated with a total of 4% of all vehicles involved in reported accidents.
  • Pedestrians involved in accidents were most likely to have failed to look properly as an associated contributory factor (recorded in 51% of all pedestrian accidents), followed by careless/reckless or in a hurry (20%), failed to judge vehicle speed/path (15%), crossed road masked by stationary/parked vehicle (13%) and impaired by alcohol (11%).

3.3 Table O also shows that many contributory factors were rarely recorded for most vehicles, for example:

  • loss of control was recorded for 19% of motorcycles but only 1% of vehicles in the bus/coach/minibus grouping;
  • sudden braking was recorded for 9% of buses but for only 3% of all vehicles involved.

3.4 On average, fewer contributory factors were recorded for pedal cycles (an average of 0.76 per cycle involved in a reported accident) and bus or coaches (an average of 0.63), compared to an overall average of 1.04 factors per vehicles.

3.5 Note that percentages differ from Tables M & N which presents the percentage of accidents with each contributory factor. As more than one vehicle may be involved in an accident, the average number of factors associated with an individual vehicle is generally lower.

Pairing of factors

3.6 Table Q shows the most frequent pairs of contributory factors assigned to the same reported road accident participant in 2018.

  • The most frequently-occurring combination is driver/rider failed to look properly + (driver/rider) failed to judge other person’s path/speed, which was recorded on 461 occasions.
  • As would be expected, the CFs identified (earlier) as most frequent to appear in several of the most frequently-occurring combinations – for example, (driver/rider) failed to look properly occurs in the first three of the most frequently-occurring combinations.

3.7 However, the numbers indicate that even the most frequently-occurring combination of CFs arose in only a small proportion of all accidents.

4 Casualties

4.1 Tables R & S show the number (and percentage) of fatal and seriously injured casualties involved in accidents where each contributory factor was reported. Unsurprisingly the pattern is similar to that seen in Tables M & N showing the number of accidents with each factor reported. Comparison shows that accidents with pedestrian only factors reported had lower numbers of casualties per accident.

4.2 Note a casualty will appear in the tables against each (unique) factor associated with the accident (resulting in the casualty) and therefore may appear more than once. As with the accident tables, repeats of the same contributory factor within an accident are excluded.

Fatalities

4.3 Table R shows the Contributory Factors associated with the largest numbers of deaths were:

  • loss of control – 44 deaths (representing 33% of all deaths in accidents for which CFs were recorded);
  • (driver/rider) failed to look properly – 35 deaths (26%);
  • (driver/rider) poor turn or manoeuvre – 24 deaths (18%);
  • (driver/rider) careless / reckless /in a hurry - 22 deaths (16% of fatalities) ;
  • Exceeding the speed limit – 18 deaths (13%);
  • Travelling too fast for the conditions – 14 deaths (10%)
  • Failed to judge other persons path/speed (driver/rider ) – 14 deaths (10%);

Seriously injured

4.4 Table S shows the CFs associated with the largest numbers of serious injured were:

  • (driver/rider) failed to look properly – 392 serious injuries (representing 27% of all serious injuries in accidents for which CFs were recorded) ;
  • loss of control – 294 serious injuries (20%);
  • failed to judge other person’s path/speed – 193 (13%);
  • poor turn or manoeuvre – 182 (13%);
  • (driver/rider) careless / reckless / in a hurry – 180 (12%);
  • pedestrian failed to look properly – 160 (11%)

5 Overall frequencies of recording

5.1 In 2019 at least one contributory factor was recorded in 99.4% of reported accidents where a police officer attended the scene (3,986) - there were 26 accidents without a contributory factor. A total of 7,949 factors were recorded, resulting in an average of 2.0 factors per accident.

5.2 Around 86% (6,854) of all factors listed related to vehicles (and their drivers/rider) and the road environment. Around 12% (935) related to pedestrians who were casualties. Relatively few related to uninjured pedestrians (64 or 0.8%).

5.3 Table T presents a ranking of all 77 factors by the frequency of reporting in 2019. (Note that figures differ from earlier tables as repeats of factors within the same accident are counted). It is apparent that some CFs are not used often – many were used fewer than 100 times.

5.4 Note that data relating to all reported CFs were used to produce Tables O to T. In cases where the same CF applies to more than one vehicle in the same accident, it is counted once for each of them. These tables therefore differ from Tables M & N (which exclude repeats of the same CF within an accident).

Possible vs. Very likely

5.5 Reporting officers record whether it was thought very likely or just possible that a factor contributed to the occurrence of the accident. Table T also shows how often each CF was described as very likely, and how often as possible.

5.6 Overall, almost two thirds of CFs (70%) were described as very likely, but the percentage varied markedly between different CFs. Excluding those used fewer than 100 times, the following were described as very likely on at least 82% of occasions on which they were used:

  • Pedestrian failed to look properly (88%)
  • (driver/rider) impaired by alcohol (82%)
  • Loss of control (80%)
  • (driver/rider) failed to look properly (77%)

and the following were described as very likely on fewer than 60% of the occasions on which they were used:

  • Pedestrian failed to judge vehicles path or speed (60%)
  • Following too close (58%)
  • (driver/rider) Illness or disability (mental/physical) (56%)
  • Exceeding speed limit (56%)
  • Travelling too fast for the conditions (54%)
  • Road layout (e.g. bend, hill, narrow carriageway (53%)

Conclusion

The collection of contributory factors has been part of the GB wide police reporting system for 14 years. It is clear contributory factor information can provide useful indications of the circumstances that may have led to a reported road accident. These can also be attributed to the different participants within the accident, which can help build a picture of how the accident may have occurred.

However, there are limitations to the system and care should be taken when both analysing and interpreting the results. This should help ensure the data is used in the correct manner and that consistent messages/results are achieved by users.

We welcome comments on the analysis presented here or any questions regarding the contributory factor system.

Transport Statistics
Transport Scotland
Victoria Quay
Edinburgh EH6 6QQ
Telephone: 0131 244 7254
Email: Transtat@transport.gov.scot

Background: The collection of Contributory Factor data

B1. Guidance on recording road accidents is provided in the Department for Transport’s Stats20 document which includes the following points on CFs:

  • CFs reflect the reporting officer’s opinion at the time of reporting, and may not be the result of extensive investigation;
  • subsequent enquiries could result in a change in the reporting officer’s opinion;
  • the CFs are largely subjective, and depend upon the skill and experience of the investigating officer to reconstruct the events which led directly to the accident;
  • the need to exercise judgement when recording CFs is unavoidable;
  • CFs should be identified on the basis of evidence from sources such as witness statements and vehicle and site inspections;
  • the evidence may be of variable quality, so the officer should record very likely or possible for each CF;
  • when there is conflicting evidence (e.g. conflicting witness statements), the reporting officer should decide on the most credible account of the accident and base the codes on this, taking into account all other available evidence.

B2. Some CFs may be less likely than others to be recorded, since clear evidence of them may not be available, or may be very difficult to obtain, after an accident has occurred (e.g. in the case of the nervous, uncertain or panic factor). Participants and witnesses may provide incomplete or conflicting accounts of what happened. The CF data therefore depend upon the skill and experience of the reporting officer to reconstruct the events which led directly to the accident, and so are more subjective in nature than other Stats 19 data. This should be kept in mind when using these results.

B3. Regardless of the number of vehicles involved in the accident, at most six sets of CF data can be recorded per accident. Each set contains three pieces of information:

  • a factor which is thought to have contributed to the occurrence of the accident – selected from list of 77 , such as:
    • exceeding speed limit (CF code 306);
    • travelling too fast for the conditions (307);
    • failed to look properly (405);
    • impaired by alcohol (501);
    • impaired by drugs (illicit or medicinal) (502)
  • the participant in the accident to whom the factor is related:
    • whether this is a:
    • Vehicle – in which case the factor may relate to the driver/rider or to the road environment;
    • Casualty – a pedestrian or a passenger in a vehicle; or
    • Uninjured pedestrian.
    • if a Vehicle or a Casualty, the relevant Stats 19 reference
  • whether it was thought very likely or just possible this factor contributed to the occurrence of the accident

Therefore more than one factor may be recorded for the same participant and any given factor may be recorded for two or more different participants, subject to the limit of a maximum of six sets of CF data per accident.

B4. Appendix B of this publication illustrates the CF codes and their descriptions, including a brief set of completion instructions for the reporting officer. More detailed information is available in the DfT’s Stats 20 document (pages 10; 84 -101) and the procedure for allocating them – for example:

  • the CFs may be recorded in any order (so nothing can be inferred from the order in which they appear);
  • more than one CF may be related to the same road user; and
  • the same CF may be related to more than one road user.

Worked example

B5. Clearly, there could be a lot of CF information in the case of an accident which involved several vehicles, if it was thought that several of them contributed to its occurrence. The following is an example of the potential complexity of the CF data. Car 1 is rapidly travelling along a straight road when Car 2 suddenly appears in front of it, having emerged from a pub car park. The driver of Car 1 brakes sharply, to avoid a collision. As Car 2 drives off, Car 1 is hit from behind by a motorcycle, whose rider and passenger are both killed. The following might be recorded as the CF data for this accident:

CF no. Participant Contributory Factor How likely?
1 Car 1 Exceeding speed limit Possible
2 Car 2 Impaired by alcohol Possible
3 Car 2 Failed to look properly Very likely
4 Car 1 Sudden braking Very likely
5 Motorcycle Following too close Very likely
6 Motorcycle Exceeding speed limit Possible

This accident has three participants and six CFs, two of which are the same (exceeding speed limit) but apply to different participants (Car 1 and Motorcycle). This example will be referred to from time to time, when describing some of the CF results.

Quality

B6. As the CFs were added to the Stats 19 data specification at the start of 2005, the results for 2005 could have been affected by teething troubles. In June 2006, the Liaison Group on Road Accident Statistics (LGRAS) discussed a paper on aspects of the quality of the data. It also remains the case the recording of CFs varies between Police Forces. In 2009, there were around 2.1 CFs per accident for Scotland; varying between 1.5 and 2.6 between Forces. In addition, while most Police Forces’ CFs are allocated by the reporting officer, in one Force they are allocated by a small team of specialist CRASH investigators. It may be that a higher degree of accuracy exists for fatal and serious accidents than for slight accidents, as the former may be attended by more experienced road policing officers.

B7. On introduction inconsistencies arose between the CF code and the Type of Participant code (around 3-4% in 2005). The most frequent problem was the combination of the CF code for pedestrian failed to look properly with the Type of Participant code for a Vehicle. In such cases, it wasn’t possible to deduce (from the data) which was incorrect. Since then additional quality assurance was introduced leading to an improvement in quality (currently around 1% of cases).

B8. There may be other changes in some of the patterns of the reporting of CFs, as a result of such discussions, the introduction of additional computer cross-checks of the data, Police Forces’ increasing experience of the collection and recording of such information, and the use of the data by the Police, local authorities and central government.

Table M: Contributory Factors: Reported accidents1,2 by severity, 2019
Contributory factor reported in accident Fatal Serious 6 Slight 6 All accidents
Number Per cent3 Number Per cent3 Number Per cent3 Number Per cent3
Road environment contributed 4 14 11 157 13 677 26 845 21
Poor or defective road surface 1 1 17 1 20 1 38 1
Deposit on road (eg oil, mud, chippings) 0 0 18 1 29 1 47 1
Slippery road (due to weather) 7 6 89 7 287 11 383 10
Inadequate/masked signs or road markings 0 0 5 0 16 1 21 1
Defective traffic signals 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 0
Traffic calming (eg road humps, chicanes 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0
Temporary road layout (eg contraflow) 1 1 3 0 10 0 14 0
Road layout (eg bend, hill, narrow c-way 3 2 29 2 81 3 113 3
Animal or other object in carriageway 2 2 13 1 34 1 49 1
Sunken,raised or slippery inspection cov 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0
Vehicle defects 4 3 2 23 2 56 2 83 2
Tyres illegal, defective or under-inflat 1 1 7 1 6 0 14 0
Defective lights or indicators 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
Defective brakes 2 2 6 0 19 1 27 1
Defective steering or suspension 0 0 3 0 5 0 8 0
Defective or missing mirrors 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
Injudicious action (driver/rider) 4 31 24 216 18 741 28 988 25
Disobeyed automatic traffic signal 0 0 12 1 49 2 61 2
Disobeyed Give Way or Stop sign or marki 3 2 32 3 63 2 98 2
Disobeyed double white line 1 1 4 0 3 0 8 0
Disobeyed pedestrian crossing facility 0 0 4 0 8 0 12 0
Illegal turn or direction of travel 0 0 11 1 14 1 25 1
Exceeding speed limit 16 13 56 5 85 3 157 4
Travelling too fast for the conditions 13 10 67 5 168 6 248 6
Following too close 2 2 29 2 134 5 165 4
Vehicle travelling along pavement 2 2 1 0 7 0 10 0
Cyclist entering road from pavement 1 1 8 1 17 1 26 1
Driver/rider error or reaction 4 88 69 806 66 2,690 102 3,594 90
Junction overshoot 1 1 25 2 69 3 95 2
Junction restart 0 0 6 0 16 1 22 1
Poor turn or manoeuvre 21 17 136 11 298 11 455 11
Failed to signal / misleading signal 3 2 11 1 51 2 65 2
Failed to look properly (D/R) 32 25 343 28 831 32 1,206 30
Failed to judge other pers path/speed (D 14 11 160 13 493 19 667 17
Too close to cyclist,horse or pedestrian 2 2 14 1 19 1 35 1
Sudden braking 3 2 32 3 127 5 162 4
Swerved 4 3 40 3 76 3 120 3
Loss of control 41 32 220 18 304 12 565 14
Impairment or distraction (driver/rider) 4 26 20 169 14 469 18 676 17
Impaired by alcohol (D/R) 5 4 47 4 79 3 131 3
Impaired by drugs (illicit/medicinal) (D 4 3 19 2 30 1 53 1
Fatigue 6 5 25 2 33 1 64 2
Uncorrected defective eyesight 2 2 2 0 4 0 8 0
Illness or disability (mental/physic) (D 9 7 43 4 67 3 119 3
Not display lights at night / in poor vi 0 0 2 0 6 0 8 0
Cyclist wearing dark clothing at night 0 0 1 0 7 0 8 0
Driver using mobile phone 2 2 2 0 5 0 9 0
Distraction in vehicle 4 3 24 2 53 2 81 2
Distraction outside vehicle 4 3 9 1 13 0 26 1
Behaviour or inexperience (driver/rider) 4 33 26 300 24 837 32 1,181 30
Aggressive driving 7 6 31 3 45 2 83 2
Careless / reckless /in a hurry (D/R) 21 17 152 12 386 15 559 14
Nervous / uncertain / panic 2 2 18 1 32 1 52 1
Driving too slow for condits / slow vehi 0 0 3 0 1 0 4 0
Inexperienced or learner driver/rider 3 2 43 4 75 3 121 3
Inexperience of driving on the left 4 3 15 1 13 0 32 1
Inexperience with type of vehicle 0 0 9 1 9 0 18 0
Vision affected 4 9 7 130 11 420 16 563 14
Stationary or parked vehicle 0 0 14 1 49 2 63 2
Vegetation 1 1 3 0 4 0 8 0
Road layout (eg bend, winding rd, hill c 2 2 13 1 26 1 41 1
Buildings, road signs, street furniture 0 0 2 0 6 0 8 0
Dazzling headlights 0 0 5 0 8 0 13 0
Dazzling sun 3 2 39 3 81 3 123 3
Rain, sleet, snow or fog 2 2 21 2 38 1 61 2
Spray from other vehicles 1 1 1 0 4 0 6 0
Visor/windscreen dirty/scratched/frosted 0 0 3 0 3 0 6 0
Vehicle blind spot 0 0 3 0 15 1 18 0
Pedestrian only 4 26 20 257 21 485 18 769 19
Crossed road masked by stationary/parked 1 1 29 2 41 2 71 2
Pedestrian failed to look properly 7 6 159 13 210 8 376 9
Ped. failed to judge vehicles path or sp 12 9 58 5 58 2 128 3
Wrong use of pedestrian crossing facilit 0 0 18 1 17 1 35 1
Dangerous action in carriageway (eg play 3 2 10 1 17 1 30 1
Pedestrian impaired by alcohol 5 4 36 3 46 2 87 2
Ped. impaired by drugs (illicit/medicina 1 1 8 1 6 0 15 0
Ped. careless / reckless /in a hurry 0 0 52 4 64 2 116 3
Pedestrian wearing dark clothing at nigh 8 6 29 2 20 1 57 1
Ped. disability or illness, mental/physi 4 3 12 1 15 1 31 1
Special codes 4 4 3 46 4 148 6 201 5
Stolen vehicle 0 0 6 0 8 0 14 0
Vehicle in course of crime 0 0 7 1 11 0 18 0
Emergency vehicle on call 0 0 2 0 15 1 17 0
Vehicle door opened or closed negligentl 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0
Other 4 3 22 2 50 2 76 2
Total reported accidents1 127   1,225   2,634   3,986 100
Number of Contributory Factors 5 309   2,450   5,190   7,949  
Average number of CFs per accident 1,5 2.4   2.0   2.0   2.0  

1 Includes only accidents where a police officer attended the scene.

2 Includes only one count of a CF per accident.

3 Columns won't sum to 100 per cent as accidents can have more than one CF.

4 Accidents with more than one CF in a category are only counted once in the category total.

5 Includes all contributory factors e.g. if two cars are involved in the same accident and both are exceeding the speed limit this would count as 2 CFs.

6 Due to changes in the the way casualty severities are recorded, figures for serious/slight casualties in 2019 are not comparable with previous years.

Table N: Contributory factors: Reported Accidents: 2015-2019 comparison1
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Contributory factor reported in accident2 Number Per cent3 Number Per cent3 Number Per cent3 Number Per cent3 Number Per cent3
Failed to look properly (D/R) 2,198 31 2,342 33 1,956 32 1,775 32 1,206 30
Failed to judge other pers path/speed (D 1,374 19 1,341 19 1,175 19 1,008 18 667 17
Loss of control 1,176 16 1,076 15 910 15 803 15 565 14
Careless / reckless /in a hurry (D/R) 966 14 1,130 16 907 15 844 15 559 14
Poor turn or manoeuvre 875 12 800 11 709 12 655 12 455 11
Slippery road (due to weather) 910 13 729 10 604 10 530 10 383 10
Pedestrian failed to look properly 677 9 668 9 562 9 530 10 376 9
Travelling too fast for the conditions 549 8 512 7 417 7 357 6 248 6
Following too close 327 5 342 5 231 4 227 4 165 4
Sudden braking 357 5 324 5 271 4 251 5 162 4
Total reported accidents1 7,138 100 7,074 100 6,082 100 5,505 100 3,986 100

1. Includes only accidents where a police officer attended the scene and in which a contributory factor was reported.

2. Includes only the ten most frequently reported contributory factor citied in 2018. Factors not shown may also have been reported.

3. Columns won't sum to 100 per cent as accidents can have more than one CF

Table O: Contributory factors: vehicles 1, 2019
Pedal cycle Motorcycle Car & Taxis Bus, coach & minibus Goods Other All vehicles
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Road environment contributed 3 12 3 56 13 436 8 7 4 43 7 8 7 562 8
Poor or defective road surface 6 2 10 2 16 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 34 0
Deposit on road (eg oil, mud, chippings) 0 0 12 3 34 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 1
Slippery road (due to weather) 4 1 22 5 306 6 5 3 24 4 5 5 366 5
Inadequate/masked signs or road markings 0 0 1 0 16 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 21 0
Defective traffic signals 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0
Traffic calming (eg road humps, chicanes 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
Temporary road layout (eg contraflow) 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 12 0
Road layout (eg bend, hill, narrow c-way 4 1 11 3 92 2 3 2 14 2 3 3 127 2
Animal or other object in carriageway 0 0 5 1 35 1 0 0 3 0 1 1 44 1
Sunken,raised or slippery inspection cov 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
Vehicle defects 3 5 1 1 0 35 1 0 0 11 2 1 1 53 1
Tyres illegal, defective or under-inflat 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 14 0
Defective lights or indicators 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Defective brakes 4 1 0 0 17 0 0 0 5 1 1 1 27 0
Defective steering or suspension 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 8 0
Defective or missing mirrors 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Overloaded or poorly loaded vehicle/trai 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0
Injudicious action (driver/rider) 3 43 12 48 12 569 10 6 3 49 8 6 5 721 10
Disobeyed automatic traffic signal 2 1 2 0 55 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 66 1
Disobeyed Give Way or Stop sign or marki 4 1 2 0 85 2 0 0 5 1 2 2 98 1
Disobeyed double white line 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0
Disobeyed pedestrian crossing facility 1 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 11 0
Illegal turn or direction of travel 0 0 3 1 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0
Exceeding speed limit 0 0 15 4 133 2 1 1 6 1 1 1 156 2
Travelling too fast for the conditions 8 2 19 5 206 4 1 1 13 2 2 2 249 3
Following too close 2 1 13 3 142 3 4 2 21 3 2 2 184 3
Vehicle travelling along pavement 3 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 0
Cyclist entering road from pavement 23 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0
Driver/rider error or reaction 3 86 24 181 43 1,903 35 40 23 235 37 34 31 2,479 35
Junction overshoot 9 3 2 0 76 1 0 0 7 1 1 1 95 1
Junction restart 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 22 0
Poor turn or manoeuvre 10 3 46 11 351 6 3 2 43 7 10 9 463 6
Failed to signal / misleading signal 3 1 0 0 51 1 2 1 7 1 2 2 65 1
Failed to look properly (D/R) 57 16 39 9 977 18 17 10 127 20 18 16 1,235 17
Failed to judge other pers path/speed (D 26 7 47 11 532 10 10 6 82 13 8 7 705 10
Too close to cyclist,horse or pedestrian 0 0 1 0 28 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 35 0
Sudden braking 1 0 18 4 128 2 14 8 13 2 0 0 174 2
Swerved 3 1 7 2 93 2 2 1 14 2 1 1 120 2
Loss of control 12 3 92 22 415 8 5 3 34 5 6 5 564 8
Impairment or distraction (driver/rider) 3 8 2 14 3 368 7 6 3 30 5 4 4 430 6
Impaired by alcohol (D/R) 0 0 6 1 108 2 1 1 9 1 1 1 125 2
Impaired by drugs (illicit/medicinal) (D 1 0 4 1 42 1 0 0 3 0 1 1 51 1
Fatigue 0 0 0 0 57 1 0 0 5 1 1 1 63 1
Uncorrected defective eyesight 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0
Illness or disability (mental/physic) (D 0 0 2 0 104 2 1 1 5 1 2 2 114 2
Not display lights at night / in poor vi 6 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 9 0
Cyclist wearing dark clothing at night 5 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0
Driver using mobile phone 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 9 0
Distraction in vehicle 0 0 0 0 66 1 1 1 12 2 1 1 80 1
Distraction outside vehicle 0 0 2 0 17 0 2 1 5 1 0 0 26 0
Behaviour or inexperience (driver/rider) 3 17 5 73 18 623 11 11 6 57 9 8 7 789 11
Aggressive driving 1 0 6 1 68 1 1 1 5 1 2 2 83 1
Careless / reckless /in a hurry (D/R) 15 4 37 9 449 8 7 4 53 8 2 2 563 8
Nervous / uncertain / panic 1 0 2 0 42 1 2 1 2 0 2 2 51 1
Driving too slow for condits / slow vehi 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0
Inexperienced or learner driver/rider 2 1 24 6 91 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 120 2
Inexperience of driving on the left 0 0 6 1 24 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 31 0
Inexperience with type of vehicle 0 0 6 1 9 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 16 0
Vision affected 3 10 3 10 2 257 5 2 1 27 4 3 3 309 4
Stationary or parked vehicle 6 2 2 0 55 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 65 1
Vegetation 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 10 0
Road layout (eg bend, winding rd, hill c 3 1 6 1 32 1 0 0 4 1 2 2 47 1
Buildings, road signs, street furniture 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0
Dazzling headlights 1 0 0 0 10 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 13 0
Dazzling sun 2 1 2 0 107 2 0 0 10 2 0 0 121 2
Rain, sleet, snow or fog 1 0 0 0 50 1 1 1 6 1 0 0 58 1
Spray from other vehicles 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0
Visor/windscreen dirty/scratched/frosted 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0
Vehicle blind spot 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 5 1 2 2 19 0
Special codes 3 0 0 3 1 77 1 2 1 13 2 2 2 97 1
Stolen vehicle 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 13 0
Vehicle in course of crime 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 16 0
Emergency vehicle on call 0 0 1 0 12 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 17 0
Vehicle door opened or closed negligentl 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0
Other 0 0 2 0 45 1 2 1 8 1 0 0 57 1
Number of vehicle Contributory Factors 2 228   481   5,364   91   590   91   6,845  
Total number of vehicles involved 356 100% 417 100% 5,456 100% 174 100% 627 100% 111 100% 7141 100%
Average number of CFs per vehicle 0.64   1.15   0.98   0.52   0.94   0.82   0.96  

1. Includes only accidents where a police officer attended the scene and in which a contributory factor was reported.

2. Excludes invalid codes or pedestrian only factors incorrectly assigned to a vehicle.

3. Vehicles with more than one CF in a category are only counted once in the category total.

Table P: Contributory factors: pedestrians 1,2, 2019
Number %
Pedestrian failed to look properly 378 45
Ped. failed to judge vehicles path or sp 128 15
Ped. careless / reckless /in a hurry 119 14
Pedestrian impaired by alcohol 89 11
Crossed road masked by stationary/parked 72 9
Pedestrian wearing dark clothing at nigh 57 7
Wrong use of pedestrian crossing facilit 37 4
Ped. disability or illness, mental/physi 31 4
Dangerous action in carriageway (eg play 30 4
Ped. impaired by drugs (illicit/medicina 15 2
All 956  
Number of Contributory Factors 3 956  
Total number of pedestrians involved1 837  
Average number of CFs per pedestrian 1.14  

1. Includes only accidents where a police officer attended the scene and in which a contributory factor was reported.

2. Includes pedestrians injured and non injured in the accident

3. Excludes pedestrians incorrectly attributed a vehicle factor or special code

Table Q: Most common pairs of contributory factors reported together 1, 2019
Factor with lower code Factor with higher code Number
Failed to look properly (D/R) Failed to judge other pers path/speed (D 278
Failed to look properly (D/R) Careless / reckless /in a hurry (D/R) 175
Poor turn or manoeuvre Failed to look properly (D/R) 165
Slippery road (due to weather) Loss of control 108
Travelling too fast for the conditions Loss of control 90
Poor turn or manoeuvre Failed to judge other pers path/speed (D 83
Slippery road (due to weather) Travelling too fast for the conditions 83
Loss of control Careless / reckless /in a hurry (D/R) 83
Failed to judge other pers path/speed (D Careless / reckless /in a hurry (D/R) 76
Pedestrian failed to look properly Ped. careless / reckless /in a hurry 75
Pedestrian failed to look properly Ped. failed to judge vehicles path or sp 74
Poor turn or manoeuvre Careless / reckless /in a hurry (D/R) 72
Poor turn or manoeuvre Loss of control 62
Exceeding speed limit Loss of control 57
Crossed road masked by stationary/parked Pedestrian failed to look properly 53
Travelling too fast for the conditions Careless / reckless /in a hurry (D/R) 52

1. Includes only accidents where a police officer attended the scene and in which a contributory factor was reported.

NOTE: the basis upon which the combinations are produced is described in the text.

However, an additional example may be helpful.

Suppose that the "defective brakes" CF has been allocated to participant A, the "failed to look properly" CF has been allocated to two participants A and B, and the "failed to judge other person's path/speed" CF has been allocated to participants A, B and C, The following combinations of CFs would be allocated to the same participant:

A defective brakes + A failed to look …

A defective brakes + A failed to judge …

A failed to look ... + A failed to judge …

B failed to look ... + B failed to judge …

Table R: Contributory factors: Casualties in reported accidents - fatalities 1, 2019
Person who was killed as a % of all fatalities
Pedestrian pedalcyclist motorcyclist Car/taxi user Other All
Road environment contributed Poor or defective road surface 0 1 0 0 0 1 1
Slippery road (due to weather) 0 0 0 6 1 7 5
Temporary road layout (eg contraflow) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
Road layout (eg bend, hill, narrow c-way 1 0 1 1 0 3 2
Animal or other object in carriageway 0 0 0 2 0 2 1
Vehicle defects Tyres illegal, defective or under-inflat 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
Defective brakes 0 0 0 2 0 2 1
Injudicious action (driver/rider) Disobeyed Give Way or Stop sign or marki 0 0 1 2 0 3 2
Disobeyed double white line 0 0 2 0 0 2 1
Exceeding speed limit 4 0 3 11 0 18 13
Travelling too fast for the conditions 0 1 4 8 1 14 10
Following too close 0 0 1 1 0 2 1
Vehicle travelling along pavement 3 0 0 0 0 3 2
Cyclist entering road from pavement 0 1 0 0 0 1 1
Driver/rider error or reaction Junction overshoot 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
Poor turn or manoeuvre 1 1 7 14 1 24 18
Failed to signal / misleading signal 1 0 1 1 0 3 2
Failed to look properly (D/R) 7 3 9 12 4 35 26
Failed to judge other pers path/speed (D 2 1 4 7 0 14 10
Too close to cyclist,horse or pedestrian 1 1 0 0 0 2 1
Sudden braking 0 0 1 1 1 3 2
Swerved 0 0 0 3 1 4 3
Loss of control 2 1 9 27 5 44 33
Impairment or distraction (driver/rider) Impaired by alcohol (D/R) 2 0 1 2 0 5 4
Impaired by drugs (illicit/medicinal) (D 1 0 0 3 0 4 3
Fatigue 0 0 0 4 2 6 4
Uncorrected defective eyesight 1 1 0 0 0 2 1
Illness or disability (mental/physic) (D 0 0 0 6 3 9 7
Driver using mobile phone 0 0 0 2 0 2 1
Distraction in vehicle 1 0 0 2 1 4 3
Distraction outside vehicle 1 0 3 1 0 5 4
Distraction outside vehicle 1 0 0 2 0 3  
Behaviour or inexperience (driver/rider) Aggressive driving 3 0 0 4 0 7 5
Careless / reckless /in a hurry (D/R) 5 1 3 13 0 22 16
Nervous / uncertain / panic 0 0 1 1 0 2 1
Inexperienced or learner driver/rider 0 0 2 1 0 3 2
Inexperience of driving on the left 0 0 3 3 0 6 4
Vision affected Vegetation 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Road layout (eg bend, winding rd, hill c 0 0 3 0 0 3 2
Dazzling sun 1 2 0 0 0 3 2
Rain, sleet, snow or fog 1 0 0 1 0 2 1
Spray from other vehicles 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
Pedestrian only Crossed road masked by stationary/parked 1 0 0 0 0 1 1
Pedestrian failed to look properly 7 0 0 0 0 7 5
Ped. failed to judge vehicles path or sp 12 0 0 0 0 12 9
Dangerous action in carriageway (eg play 3 0 0 0 0 3 2
Pedestrian impaired by alcohol 5 0 0 0 0 5 4
Ped. impaired by drugs (illicit/medicina 1 0 0 0 0 1 1
Pedestrian wearing dark clothing at nigh 8 0 0 0 0 8 6
Ped. disability or illness, mental/physi 4 0 0 0 0 4 3
Special codes Other 1 0 0 2 1 4 3
Total Road fatalities 38 7 21 59 9 134 100%

1. Includes only accidents where a police officer attended the scene and in which a contributory factor was reported.

NB: As described in the text, an accident will be counted once for each combination of CF (excluding "repeats") and death.

For example, an accident with four different CFs and three deaths would be counted twelve times in this table - each death would be counted against the first CF, then against the second CF, and so on. As a result, the percentages would total far more than 100%.

However, "repeats" are excluded: if the same CF applies to two different participants, each death will be counted only once against that CF.

Table S: Contributory factors: Casualties in reported accidents - seriously injured 1 2, 2019
Person who was seriously injured as a % of all seriously injured casualties
Pedestrian pedalcyclist motorcyclist Car/taxi user Other All
Road environment contributed Poor or defective road surface 0 3 9 6 0 18 1
Deposit on road (eg oil, mud, chippings) 0 0 9 9 0 18 1
Slippery road (due to weather) 8 4 10 76 5 103 7
Inadequate/masked signs or road markings 0 0 0 9 0 9 1
Defective traffic signals 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
Temporary road layout (eg contraflow) 2 0 1 0 1 4 0
Road layout (eg bend, hill, narrow c-way 3 2 6 19 2 32 2
Animal or other object in carriageway 2 0 4 11 1 18 1
Vehicle defects Tyres illegal, defective or under-inflat 0 0 2 9 2 13 1
Defective brakes 1 1 0 4 2 8 1
Defective steering or suspension 0 0 0 3 1 4 0
Overloaded or poorly loaded vehicle/trai 0 1 0 1 1 3 0
Injudicious action (driver/rider) Disobeyed automatic traffic signal 3 2 1 8 0 14 1
Disobeyed Give Way or Stop sign or marki 0 3 5 29 2 39 3
Disobeyed double white line 0 0 1 3 0 4 0
Disobeyed pedestrian crossing facility 3 1 0 0 0 4 0
Illegal turn or direction of travel 3 0 2 11 0 16 1
Exceeding speed limit 7 0 10 51 7 75 5
Travelling too fast for the conditions 7 4 9 63 7 90 6
Following too close 0 0 13 19 1 33 2
Vehicle travelling along pavement 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Cyclist entering road from pavement 0 8 0 0 0 8 1
Driver/rider error or reaction Junction overshoot 1 6 3 21 2 33 2
Junction restart 0 0 0 8 1 9 1
Poor turn or manoeuvre 12 10 38 103 19 182 13
Failed to signal / misleading signal 1 3 6 4 0 14 1
Failed to look properly (D/R) 72 58 66 181 15 392 27
Failed to judge other pers path/speed (D 18 18 45 103 9 193 13
Too close to cyclist,horse or pedestrian 3 11 0 0 0 14 1
Sudden braking 4 1 13 13 3 34 2
Swerved 2 2 5 38 4 51 4
Loss of control 8 5 61 197 23 294 20
Impairment or distraction (driver/rider) Impaired by alcohol (D/R) 4 0 5 47 13 69 5
Impaired by drugs (illicit/medicinal) (D 1 1 2 20 4 28 2
Fatigue 2 0 0 35 3 40 3
Uncorrected defective eyesight 1 1 0 0 0 2 0
Illness or disability (mental/physic) (D 1 0 3 42 10 56 4
Not display lights at night / in poor vi 1 1 0 0 0 2 0
Cyclist wearing dark clothing at night 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Driver using mobile phone 0 0 0 2 1 3 0
Distraction in vehicle 0 2 0 32 3 37 3
Distraction outside vehicle 0 1 1 8 0 10 1
Behaviour or inexperience (driver/rider) Aggressive driving 5 1 4 26 5 41 3
Careless / reckless /in a hurry (D/R) 20 18 29 105 8 180 12
Nervous / uncertain / panic 1 4 2 13 3 23 2
Driving too slow for condits / slow vehi 0 0 0 3 0 3 0
Inexperienced or learner driver/rider 2 2 15 39 0 58 4
Inexperience of driving on the left 0 0 7 16 0 23 2
Inexperience with type of vehicle 0 0 5 10 0 15  
Vision affected Stationary or parked vehicle 8 1 4 1 0 14 1
Vegetation 1 1 0 1 0 3 0
Road layout (eg bend, winding rd, hill c 3 1 3 8 0 15 1
Buildings, road signs, street furniture 1 0 0 1 0 2 0
Dazzling headlights 3 0 0 2 0 5 0
Dazzling sun 9 10 7 15 0 41 3
Rain, sleet, snow or fog 10 1 0 12 0 23 2
Spray from other vehicles 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
Visor/windscreen dirty/scratched/frosted 1 1 0 1 0 3 0
Vehicle blind spot 1 0 0 2 0 3 0
Pedestrian only Crossed road masked by stationary/parked 28 1 0 0 0 29 2
Pedestrian failed to look properly 154 4 2 0 0 160 11
Ped. failed to judge vehicles path or sp 56 1 2 3 0 62 4
Wrong use of pedestrian crossing facilit 17 2 0 0 0 19 1
Dangerous action in carriageway (eg play 8 2 0 0 0 10 1
Pedestrian impaired by alcohol 33 0 0 3 1 37 3
Ped. impaired by drugs (illicit/medicina 8 0 0 0 0 8 1
Ped. careless / reckless /in a hurry 49 0 1 4 0 54 4
Pedestrian wearing dark clothing at nigh 29 0 0 0 0 29 2
Ped. disability or illness, mental/physi 10 0 0 1 1 12 1
Special codes Stolen vehicle 0 0 0 7 0 7 0
Vehicle in course of crime 3 0 0 5 0 8 1
Emergency vehicle on call 0 0 0 2 0 2 0
Other 10 1 2 11 2 26 2
All serious injuries 316 120 219 709 82 1,446 100%

1. Includes only accidents where a police officer attended the scene and in which a contributory factor was reported.

2 Due to changes in the the way casualty severities are recorded, figures for serious casualties in 2019 are not comparable with previous years.

NB: As described in the text, an accident will be counted once for each combination of CF (excluding "repeats") and serious injury. For example, an accident with four different CFs and three serious injury would be counted twelve times in this table - each serious injury would be counted against the first CF, then against the second CF, and so on. As a result, the percentages would total far more than 100%. However, "repeats" are excluded: if the same CF applies to two different participants, each serious injury will be counted only once against that CF.

Table T: Contributory factors: ranked1,2, 2019
Rank Contributory Factor reported in each accident Number As a % of all contributory factors1
Very likely Possible Total
1 Failed to look properly (D/R) 954 288 1,242 16%
2 Failed to judge other pers path/speed (D 491 217 708 9%
3 Loss of control 457 111 568 7%
4 Careless / reckless /in a hurry (D/R) 393 171 564 7%
5 Poor turn or manoeuvre 341 123 464 6%
6 Slippery road (due to weather) 273 123 396 5%
7 Pedestrian failed to look properly 332 47 379 5%
8 Travelling too fast for the conditions 136 115 251 3%
9 Following too close 108 77 185 2%
10 Sudden braking 108 67 175 2%
11 Exceeding speed limit 88 70 158 2%
12 Ped. failed to judge vehicles path or sp 78 53 131 2%
13 Impaired by alcohol (D/R) 110 20 130 2%
14 Dazzling sun 86 43 129 2%
15 Road layout (eg bend, hill, narrow c-way 68 60 128 2%
16 Inexperienced or learner driver/rider 74 47 121 2%
17 Swerved 86 34 120 2%
18 Illness or disability (mental/physic) (D 67 52 119 1%
19 Ped. careless / reckless /in a hurry 87 32 119 1%
20 Disobeyed Give Way or Stop sign or marki 87 11 98 1%
21 Junction overshoot 63 32 95 1%
22 Pedestrian impaired by alcohol 71 19 90 1%
23 Aggressive driving 62 21 83 1%
24 Other 68 13 81 1%
25 Distraction in vehicle 34 47 81 1%
26 Crossed road masked by stationary/parked 62 10 72 1%
27 Stationary or parked vehicle 44 24 68 1%
28 Disobeyed automatic traffic signal 47 20 67 1%
29 Failed to signal / misleading signal 36 29 65 1%
30 Fatigue 32 32 64 1%
31 Rain, sleet, snow or fog 37 26 63 1%
32 Pedestrian wearing dark clothing at nigh 39 18 57 1%
33 Impaired by drugs (illicit/medicinal) (D 29 24 53 1%
34 Nervous / uncertain / panic 23 29 52 1%
35 Animal or other object in carriageway 36 14 50 1%
36 Road layout (eg bend, winding rd, hill c 30 18 48 1%
37 Deposit on road (eg oil, mud, chippings) 33 14 47 1%
38 Poor or defective road surface 23 16 39 0%
39 Wrong use of pedestrian crossing facilit 34 3 37 0%
40 Too close to cyclist,horse or pedestrian 22 13 35 0%
41 Inexperience of driving on the left 26 6 32 0%
42 Ped. disability or illness, mental/physi 18 13 31 0%
43 Dangerous action in carriageway (eg play 22 8 30 0%
44 Defective brakes 9 18 27 0%
45 Cyclist entering road from pavement 23 3 26 0%
46 Distraction outside vehicle 10 16 26 0%
47 Illegal turn or direction of travel 23 2 25 0%
48 Inadequate/masked signs or road markings 11 11 22 0%
49 Junction restart 16 6 22 0%
50 Vehicle blind spot 9 10 19 0%
51 Inexperience with type of vehicle 7 11 18 0%
52 Vehicle in course of crime 14 4 18 0%
53 Emergency vehicle on call 15 3 18 0%
54 Temporary road layout (eg contraflow) 10 6 16 0%
55 Ped. impaired by drugs (illicit/medicina 12 3 15 0%
56 Stolen vehicle 13 1 14 0%
57 Tyres illegal, defective or under-inflat 7 7 14 0%
58 Dazzling headlights 6 7 13 0%
59 Disobeyed pedestrian crossing facility 11 1 12 0%
60 Vehicle travelling along pavement 10 - 10 0%
61 Vegetation 9 1 10 0%
62 Not display lights at night / in poor vi 6 3 9 0%
63 Driver using mobile phone 1 8 9 0%
64 Buildings, road signs, street furniture 3 6 9 0%
65 Cyclist wearing dark clothing at night 5 3 8 0%
66 Disobeyed double white line 7 1 8 0%
67 Defective steering or suspension 3 5 8 0%
68 Uncorrected defective eyesight 3 5 8 0%
69 Spray from other vehicles 1 5 6 0%
70 Visor/windscreen dirty/scratched/frosted 5 1 6 0%
71 Traffic calming (eg road humps, chicanes 4 1 5 0%
72 Defective traffic signals 3 2 5 0%
73 Overloaded or poorly loaded vehicle/trai 1 3 4 0%
74 Driving too slow for condits / slow vehi 2 2 4 0%
75 Vehicle door opened or closed negligentl 3 - 3 0%
76 Sunken,raised or slippery inspection cov 1 1 2 0%
77 Defective or missing mirrors 1 - 1 0%
78 Defective lights or indicators 1 - 1 0%
All 5,580 2,366 7,946 100%

1. Includes only accidents where a police officer attended the scene and in which a contributory factor was reported.

2. Includes all contributory factors reported, even where the same CF is assigned more than once to an accident (i.e. to more than one particpant). Therefore the total differs from earlier tables.

(D/R) indicates Driver/Rider