Forth Replacement Crossing: Route Corridor Options Review

Report on Scheme Development: January to May 2008

This report is also available in pdf format (184k)


Bibliography and Workstream Timeline

1 Introduction
1.1 Background
1.2 Purpose of Route Corridor Options Review

2 Initial Assessment Stage
2.1 Rationale for Southern Route Corridor Options Removal
2.2 Northern Route Corridor Options

3 Recommendations for Further Assessment
3.1 Recommendation
3.2 Southern Route Corridor Options
3.3 Northern Route Corridor Options

4 Further Assessment Stage

5 North Corridor Option 1
5.1 Description
5.2 Engineering Issues
5.3 Environmental Considerations
5.4 Transportation Considerations
5.5 North Corridor Option 1 Recommendation

6 North Corridor Option 2
6.1 Description
6.2 Engineering Issues
6.3 Environmental Considerations
6.4 Transportation Considerations
6.5 North Corridor Option 2 Recommendation

7 North Corridor Option 3
7.1 Description
7.2 Engineering Issues
7.3 Environmental Considerations
7.4 Transportation Considerations
7.5 North Corridor Option 3 Recommendation

8 South Corridor Option 1
8.1 Description
8.2 Engineering Issues
8.3 Environmental Considerations
8.4 Transportation Considerations
8.5 South Corridor Option 1 Recommendation

9 South Corridor Option 2
9.1 Description
9.2 Engineering Issues
9.3 Environmental Considerations
9.4 Transportation Considerations
9.5 South Corridor Option 2 Recommendation

10 South Corridor Option 3
10.1 Description
10.2 Engineering Issues
10.3 Environmental Considerations
10.4 Transportation Considerations
10.5 South Corridor Option 3 Recommendation

11 South Corridor Option 4A
11.1 Description
11.2 Engineering Issues
11.3 Environmental Considerations
11.4 Transportation Considerations
11.5 South Corridor Option 4A Recommendation

12 Recommendations for Further Development
12.1 Rationale for Route Corridor Option Removal
12.2 Recommendation


Appendix 1 - Initial Assessment of Route Corridor Options
Appendix 2 - Initial Assessment Matrices
Appendix 3 - North Corridor Option 1 (D3M)
Appendix 4 - North Corridor Option 2 (D2M)
Appendix 5 - North Corridor Option 3 (D3M)
Appendix 6 - South Corridor Option 1 (D3M)
Appendix 7 - South Corridor Option 2 (D3M)
Appendix 8 - South Corridor Option 3 (D3M)
Appendix 9 - South Corridor Option 4A (D2M)

No part of this report may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Jacobs Arup – Jacobs Engineering UK Limited and Ove Arup & Partners International Limited Consortium. If you have received this report in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Jacobs Arup.

This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the commissioning party and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Jacobs Arup, no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of this report. No liability is accepted by Jacobs Arup for any use of this report, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided.

Opinions and information provided in the report are on the basis of Jacobs Arup using due skill, care and diligence in the preparation of the same and no warranty is provided as to their accuracy.

It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Jacobs Arup has been made.

Published Date 14 Apr 2009 Type Projects